Device Capabilities

Capability 2.1 - Device Inventory

Capability 2.1 — Device Inventory
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Pillar Capability
2 - Device 2.1 - Device Inventory
Description
DoW Components establish and maintain an approved inventory list of all devices authorized to access the network and enroll all devices on the network prior to network connection. Device attributes will include technical details such as the PKI (802.1x) machine certificate, device object, patch/vulnerability status and others to enable successor activities.
Impact to ZT
By default policy, devices will be denied network access; the only devices permitted access to the network shall be known, authorized, and listed in the device inventory.

2.1 Device Inventory - Scenario

The following scenario illustrates the practical applications and considerations for this capability:

  • The Component conducts a device health tool gap analysis to identify missing capabilities required for tracking and managing devices on the network.
  • A centralized device inventory system is implemented, enrolling all devices with their attributes such as Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) machine certificates, device objects, and patch/vulnerability status.
  • The Component establishes a policy that denies network access to any device not listed in the inventory, ensuring only known and authorized devices can connect.
  • During the initial enrollment phase, several legacy devices with outdated firmware are flagged as non-compliant and either updated or removed from the network.
  • A contractor attempts to connect a personal device to the network without prior enrollment, triggering an automatic block and generating an alert for the Security Operations Center (SOC).
  • The Component's security team uses the inventory system to verify and validate that all connected devices are patched and meet baseline security standards before allowing continued network access.
  • During a routine vulnerability scan, a device on the network is identified as non-compliant due to an expired PKI certificate. The inventory system flags the device and quarantines it until the certificate is renewed.
  • Non-Person Entities (NPEs) such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices are also enrolled in the inventory with detailed attributes, enabling the Component to manage and monitor these devices alongside User/Person Entity (PE)-operated systems.
  • The Component integrates its device inventory with the Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) to ensure device trust is continuously verified in conjunction with User/PE authentication.
  • By maintaining a trusted device inventory, the Component ensures only authorized, compliant devices can access the network, thereby reducing the attack surface and reinforcing Zero Trust (ZT) principles.

Positive Impacts

The following is not a comprehensive list of benefits, but rather a selection of the advantages fundamental to this capability:

  • Enhanced Security
  • Improved Compliance
  • Streamlined Device Management
  • Reduced Attack Surface

Technologies

The following is not a comprehensive list of technologies:

  • Asset/Device/Endpoint Management Solutions
  • Configuration Management Databases (CMDBs)
  • Information Technology Asset Management (ITAM) Software
  • Internet of Things (IoT) Discovery Solutions
  • Inventory and Asset Management Solutions

Activity 2.1.1 - Device Health Tool Gap Analysis

Activity 2.1.1 — Device Health Tool Gap Analysis
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components develop an inventory of devices within the environment, and device attributes are tracked.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None None
Expected Outcomes
  • Inventory of authorized and approved devices is created per Component with owners.
  • Determine and implement tools to gauge device health.
End State
A comprehensive inventory of authorized and approved devices with designated owners, and effective tools for monitoring and assessing device health are implemented.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Consider completing Activity 1.1.1 (Discovery) – Inventory User and Activity 3.1.1 (Discovery) – Application and Code Identification prior to this activity, to designate device ownership.
  • Leverage existing security solutions and infrastructure (e.g., Security Information and Event Management (SIEM); Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR), etc.) for integration and data collection.
  • System owners should collect and inventory all relevant data points to establish a detailed overview.
  • The data collected for the inventory, including information about devices and Users/Person Entities (PEs), should be uniformly formatted for machine readability. This ensures that device management and access software can make accurate access decisions and support future automation as the inventory process matures.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.1.1 — Device Health Tool Gap Analysis
Inventory all physical and virtual devices in the environment, categorizing them by type (e.g., laptops, desktops, Internet of Things (IoT), mobile, Operational Technology (OT), etc.).
Complete a manual inventory of devices:
  • Leverage existing Environment documentation (e.g., Ports, Protocols, and Services Management (PPSM), etc.) to generate an inventory of physical and virtual devices, resulting in a comprehensive Hardware/Software List.
  • Manually audit the physical and virtual infrastructure to verify and validate PPSM data (e.g., ensure only approved ports, like Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) 443, are open on internet-facing servers) and the Hardware/Software List.
Deploy effective solutions for monitoring and assessing device health.
Complete an automated inventory of devices:
  • Identify existing Information Technology Asset Management (ITAM) systems that can assess device health information within the environment.
  • Determine if additional asset management tools, hardware, and/or software are required to supplement existing tools.
Implement tools to gauge device health:
  • Install additional asset management servers needed to assess device health, as required.
  • Deploy endpoint-based agents, where possible, that perform asset management, vulnerability scanning, and security posture monitoring.
  • Leverage all asset management systems (e.g., automated vulnerability scanning and device configuration assessments, etc.) to gather data, evaluate the environment for all devices, and identify systems not already indicated via the manual process.
Analyze log outputs:
  • Leverage network monitoring solutions within the SIEM to identify devices based on their network communication. SIEM solutions can be effective tools for collecting and correlating log activity.
Utilize management solutions to centrally store device data:
  • Use management solutions (e.g., Information Technology Asset Managements (ITAMs) and Configuration Management Databases (CMDBs), etc.), as a central repository for storing and managing device inventory and data, where possible.
Designate ownership for each device.
Define administrative roles:
  • In accordance with Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) requirements, define administrator roles for each device type (e.g., virtual systems administrators, physical infrastructure administrators, environment and endpoint security administrators, etc.).
Coordinate device management and Identity, Credential, and Access Management (ICAM) solutions:
  • Leverage the User Inventory from Activity 1.1.1 (Discovery) – Inventory User, to designate ownership of devices to maintain accountability and set the necessary controls in the Mobile Device Management (MDM) and/or Unified Endpoint Management (UEM), where possible, to ensure only approved Users/PEs are operating their respective technology resources.
Ensure compatibility and proper communication with Network Access Controls (NACs):
  • Ensure devices are properly integrated with ICAM and Identity Provider (IdP) services.
Monitor the health status of devices.
Manage device health management:
  • Leverage and review documentation of the inventory conducted previously.
  • Verify and validate that the Component devices are identified and consistently managed, according to Enterprise policies and procedures.
  • Utilize asset management solutions to monitor device health for abnormalities in device behavior and functionality.
  • Regularly monitor and document device status (e.g., configuration settings, installed/operating security software, patch status, signature status, etc.).
  • Verify and validate the accuracy of device health information, as it is critical when making device access decisions.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of device inventory and attribute management. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including an inventory of approved devices per Component, along with their owners.

Activity 2.1.1 — Device Health Tool Gap Analysis - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is a manual inventory of devices created per Component with designated owners?
  2. How are device attributes tracked and utilized in the inventory?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for inventorying all devices, including laptops, desktops, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, mobile devices, and Operational Technology (OT) devices, and categorizing them by type and management status.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by deploying endpoint-based agents (if chosen), conducting active and passive network scans, analyzing logs, and using asset management tools to create a comprehensive, centrally managed device inventory.
  • The Component provides evidence that it designates device ownership and ensures compatibility with Identity, Credential, and Access Management (ICAM) and Network Access Control (NAC) solutions, maintaining accountability and approved use.
  • The Component continuously monitors device inventory to identify gaps in device health management, leveraging integrated endpoint management tools (e.g., Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution, etc.) in addition to verifying and validating that all devices meet established security and compliance standards.
  • The Component regularly audits and refines its device inventory, ensuring that processes remain effective, policies are followed, and identified gaps are addressed, thus maintaining a robust device management posture aligned with the Component’s security framework.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Inventory of authorized and approved devices is created per Component with owners.
  2. Determine and implement tools to gauge device health.

Activity 2.1.2 - Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management

Activity 2.1.2 — Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components utilize the DoW Enterprise PKI solution/service to deploy X.509 certificates to all supported and managed devices. Other Non-Person Entities (NPEs) (e.g., web servers, network devices, routers, applications, etc.) that support X.509 certificates are assigned them in the PKI and/or IdP systems.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
2.6.2 2.2.1, 2.3.6, 2.4.1
Expected Outcomes
  • Non-person entities are managed via Component PKI and IdP.
End State
Components use established PKI and IdP solutions to manage all NPEs.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1 is defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as a predecessor to this activity.
  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis prior to this activity, to obtain an accurate device inventory list.
  • Determine whether the system will utilize its own internal Certificate Authority (CA), Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), or a combination of both.
  • Activity 1.9.1 (Phase Two) – Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1 establishes the integration of the Component to the Enterprise PKI. If this activity has not yet been completed, then the Component will need to establish its own internal CA.
  • Determine the most secure certificate encryption type and signing algorithm for each product in the environment in accordance with Enterprise requirements and Component operational demands.
  • Where possible, allow for the ability to issue multiple encryption strengths that meet the Component’s security requirements.
  • Leverage cryptographic industry standards, such as National Institute of Standards (NIST) Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-3.
    • Examples include Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)-256, Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA)-4096, and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) with appropriate key lengths.
    • Consider Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) options, to include emerging NIST PQC guidance.
  • Create a plan to issue certificates for devices, Users/Person Entities (PEs), and Non-Person Entities (NPEs), and establish a policy to determine when certificate sharing is permitted.
    • Policies should clearly define the conditions under which certificate sharing is permissible, such as for specific application integrations or service accounts, and mandate robust security controls to mitigate risks.
  • Determine the approved signed certificates for use across multiple functions within a product (e.g., Secure Shell (SSH), Hypertext Transfer Protocol Service (HTTPS), Lightweight Directory Access Protocols (LDAPs), etc.).
  • Create a plan to renew and revoke certificates within the environment, including automated revocation through Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) policies for a maximum duration based on the encryption strength.
  • Check accesses regularly, as revocation may be needed if an NPE is no longer necessary or if solutions change in such a way that the level of access is no longer required.
  • Activity 2.2.1 (Phase Two) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1, Activity 2.3.6 (Phase Three) – Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Part 1, and Activity 2.4.1 (Phase One) – Deny Device by Default Policy are defined by the DoW ZT Framework as successors to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.1.2 — Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management
Implement Enterprise PKI solution/service to deploy X.509 certificates to all supported and managed devices.
The process for PKI to deploy X.509 certificates is focused on the following:
  • Leverage approved inventory, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis, of all supported and managed (devices) and NPEs.
  • Ensure the minimum validity period is documented, verified, and validated to ensure that proper processes are followed to ensure complete coverage and avoid certificate issuance for unapproved devices.
Define certificate policies:
  • Leverage previously established regulations/guidelines to define policies that will govern the issuance and usage of the X.509 certificates (PKI certificates and Protocols).
  • Identify specific detailed PKI requirements (e.g., CA (Root, Intermediate, or Subordinate), Validation Authority (VA), and Registration Authority, etc.) along with required devices for issuing X.509 certificates.
Establish a CA:
  • Establish a CA using Component PKI certificates as required by policy. A CA is needed to issue required public-key certificates and provide the core authentication, integrity, and confidentiality services.
Generate X.509 Certificates:
  • Generate X.509 certificates for each supported and managed device.
  • Ensure the established CA signs certificates.
  • Ensure certificates include the required information: device identity, expiration date, and usage constraints.
Establish a certificate enrollment process (enroll all devices in the environment in accordance with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) policies):
  • Implement a secure and automated process for devices to enroll X.509 certificates.
  • Enforce strong Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), approval methods to ensure only approved devices can request and receive certificates.
  • Verify and validate password security for the X.509 certificates. Malicious hackers may try to intercept messages as they are transmitted between computers and software entities.
  • Enforce strong password authentication methods. When passwords are extracted, all Enterprise and/or sensitive data can be accessed without proper permission and approval.
Deploy a certificate management solution:
  • Configure a certificate management infrastructure that allows for the distribution, revocation, and renewal of X.509 certificates.
  • Include mechanisms for securely storing and distributing certificates to the supported devices.
Integrate a PKI solution:
  • Integrate PKI solution with the environment architecture.
  • Configure the devices to use the X.509 certificates to authenticate, approve supported and managed devices.
Continuous monitoring and maintenance:
  • Ensure continuous monitoring of the PKI solution to verify and validate proper functionality of the certificate management process, such as certificate expirations, revocation status, and CA health.
  • Update and renew certificates as required to maintain the security and integrity of the system.
  • Backup X.509 certificates and maintenance.
Assign NPEs (e.g., web servers, network devices, routers, applications, etc.) that support X.509 certificates to the Enterprise PKI or the implemented PKI/Identity Provider (IdP) solution
Implement NPEs into a Component’s PKI and IdP:
  • Generate X.509 certificates:
    • NPEs can request an X.509 certificate.
    • Approve X.509 certificates with PKI and Single Sign-On (SSO) and apply Least Privilege access control.
  • Continuous monitoring and revocation:
    • Implement a process to continuously monitor and revoke outdated/no longer valid X.509 certificates and back up X.509 certificates with security keys (private keys). CAs should consider issuing and processing Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs). The RA has the privilege to revoke NPE certificates after they have been issued.
    • Develop a Component security awareness program for NPEs.
    • Integrate the process with the Component Incident Response (IR) community.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.1.2 (Phase One) – Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of an Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) solution to deploy X.509 certificates and Non-Person Entity (NPE) management. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including NPE management via Component PKI and Identity Provider (IdP).

Activity 2.1.2 — Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is the DoW Enterprise PKI solution used to deploy X.509 certificates to all supported and managed devices?
  2. How are NPEs managed via organizational PKI and IdP systems?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for implementing the Enterprise PKI solution, issuing X.509 certificates to all supported and managed devices, and aligning with established Enterprise requirements, certificate policies, and security requirements.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by conducting a comprehensive inventory of supported devices, establishing a Certificate Authority (CA) and enrollment process, and ensuring that each device receives and properly uses X.509 certificates for authentication and approval.
  • The Component provides evidence that strong authentication methods (e.g., Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), secure password handling, etc.) are enforced for certificate issuance, deployment, and renewal, thereby mitigating the risk of unapproved access.
  • The Component integrates the PKI solution into its network architecture, continuously monitors the PKI infrastructure, and maintains certificate management processes (including revocation and renewal) to ensure ongoing certificate integrity and trust.
  • The Component incorporates NPEs into the PKI and IdP solution, assigning X.509 certificates and implementing continuous monitoring, revocation procedures, and security awareness programs to maintain compliance and protect critical resources.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Non-Person Entities are managed via Component PKI and IdP.

Activity 2.1.3 - Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1

Activity 2.1.3 — Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP), either using a centralized technology or federated organizational technologies, integrates Non-Person Entities (NPEs), such as devices and service accounts. Integration is tracked in the Enterprise Device Management solution when applicable as to whether it is integrated or not. NPEs not able to be integrated with the IdP are either marked for retirement or excepted using a risk-based methodical approach.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None 2.1.4
Expected Outcomes
  • Component NPEs are integrated with Enterprise IdP.
  • Where applicable, ensure tracking in the UEM solution.
End State
All NPEs are assigned static attributes in an identity provider, provided an exception based on risk analysis, or marked for retirement, as part of the Enterprise Life Cycle Management plan.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Presumption: The Component has completed Activity 1.5.1 (Phase One) – Organizational Identity Lifecycle Management (ILM) prior to this activity. Non-Person Entities (NPEs) will be integrated with the Component Identify Lifecycle Management (ILM).
  • Consider completing Activity 1.9.1 (Phase Two) – Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1 prior to this activity, as it is necessary to establish an Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) prior to the enrollment of NPEs.
    • If an Enterprise IdP is not yet available, then the Component must have established its own IdP, per Activity 1.3.1 (Phase One) – Organizational Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and Identity Provider (IdP).
  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis prior to this activity, to leverage device inventory.
  • Consider completing Activity 2.6.1 (Phase One) – Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools prior to this activity, to leverage the Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution to track NPEs.
  • Consider completing Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1 prior to this activity, to leverage the Enterprise Device Management (EDM) solution to track NPEs.
  • Use a risk-based methodology to determine NPE decommission or exceptions.
  • Activity 2.1.4 (Phase Three) – Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) Part 2 is defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as a successor to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.1.3 — Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1
Define NPE ILM requirements.
Lifecycle management of NPEs:
  • Leverage the Component ILM plan, from Activity 1.5.1 (Phase One) – Organizational Identity Lifecycle Management (ILM).
  • Define how NPEs will be managed by the existing Component ILM plan.
  • Identify NPE information that will be tracked in accordance with the ILM. Information should include at a minimum:
    • NPE attributes
    • Integration status with the IdP
    • Support for automated reporting and alerting
Manage NPEs outside the standard ILM process through risk-based exceptions.
Manage exceptions:
  • NPEs outside the standard ILM process are:
    • Identified
    • Documented
    • Approved/Rejected
  • The Enterprise and/or Component determines risk.
    • This methodology should consider factors such as the NPE's function, criticality, security posture, and the potential impact of not integrating it with the IdP.
    • Document the rationale for any exceptions granted.
  • Approval is granted when the exception justification outweighs the risk(s) to the Enterprise/Component.
  • Approval is periodically reassessed.
Integrate NPEs, such as devices and service accounts, with the Enterprise IdP.
Integrate NPE device inventory from established inventory lists in prior activities:
  • Leverage approved Hardware/Software List for environment authentication, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
    • Ensure consistent device identification and attributes across systems and avoid onboarding unapproved devices.
  • Ensure the minimum attestation (verification and validity period) is defined and documented.
  • Verify and validate that proper processes are in place and enforced.
Document applications and services that the NPEs will access:
  • Document all applications, operating systems, and cloud services the NPEs will access, as applicable, to inform appropriate access control policies.
Configure and integrate the EDM solution:
  • Collaborate with the Enterprise to obtain and review the established requirements for NPE integration with the Enterprise IdP.
  • Designated System Administrators (SAs) install and configure the EDM, ensuring it supports NPEs, meets Component needs, and maintains a healthy cybersecurity posture.
Integrate Enterprise IdP with Component applications:
  • Integrate the IdP with each identified application using appropriate integration methods (e.g., Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML), Open Authorization (OAuth), etc.).
  • Document all configuration choices and deviations from standard configurations as necessary.
  • A review should be conducted by appropriate personnel, as needed, for the integration to ensure compliance with Enterprise regulatory policies and guidance.
  • Establish connections between the Enterprise IdP and all Component applications, ensuring seamless authentication and approval processes.
Ensure alignment with Enterprise security and privacy regulations:
  • Verify and validate that the integration complies with relevant Enterprise security and privacy regulations (e.g., General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), etc.)
Assign all NPEs’ static attributes in the IdP and provide an exception based on risk analysis, or mark the NPEs for retirement as part of the Enterprise Lifecycle Management plan.
Define and manage NPE roles and access controls:
  • Leverage Enterprise defined and established guidance, from Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1, for assigning NPE attributes in the IdP.
  • Establish clear authentication protocols, ports, services, approval rules, and NPE management policies.
  • Identify each of the following for all NPEs:
    • Role(s)
    • Access(es)
    • Privilege(s)
  • System Administrators define, assign, and manage roles/access controls for NPEs, specifying what each NPE can/cannot access, adhering to the principle of Least Privilege.
Utilize EDM solution(s) to track NPEs.
Leverage the EDM solution:
  • Leverage the Component Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution, from Activity 2.6.1 (Phase One) – Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools.
  • Leverage the Component EDM solution, from Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1.
  • Verify and validate the EDM solution to automate, where possible, device management related to critical data and services.
  • Document any EDM ILM integration deficiencies in accordance with Component policies and implement an alternate solution as required.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.1.3 (Phase Two) – Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1 of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of Non-Person Entity (NPE) integration into the Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP). It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including the integration of NPE into the Enterprise IdP and tracking within the Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution.

Activity 2.1.3 — Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1 - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How are NPEs including devices integrated with the Enterprise IdP?
  2. How are devices tracked in the Enterprise Device Management (EDM) solution?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for integrating NPEs, such as devices and service accounts, with the Enterprise IdP, ensuring alignment with the Enterprise guidelines, security standards, and ZT principles.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by identifying NPEs, establishing secure authentication methods (e.g., certificates, tokens, etc.), and configuring trust relationships with the Enterprise IdP, assigning static attributes, roles, and appropriate access controls based on defined policies and a risk-based approach.
  • The Component provides evidence that NPE integration with the IdP is tested, monitored, and continuously assessed for security and functionality, including the use of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and automated response actions to detect and remediate anomalies in real-time.
  • The Component leverages UEDM solutions to track and manage NPEs, maintaining a complete lifecycle management plan that includes regularly reviewing device attributes, enforcing Least Privilege, and decommissioning or granting exceptions for NPEs as necessary.
  • The Component ensures ongoing compliance through continuous auditing, policy reviews, and personnel training, updating integration processes and IdP configurations, as needed, to address emerging threats, maintain interoperability, and uphold the Enterprise security mandates.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Component NPEs are integrated with Enterprise IdP.
  2. Where applicable, ensure tracking in the UEM solution.

Capability 2.2 - Device Detection and Compliance

Capability 2.2 — Device Detection and Compliance
DoW CIO Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Pillar Capability
2 - Device 2.2 - Device Detection and Compliance
Description
DoW Components employ asset management systems for user devices to maintain and report on IT and Cybersecurity compliance. Managed devices (enterprise and mobile) attempting to connect to a network or access a DAAS resource is detected and has its compliance status confirmed (via C2C)
Impact to ZT
Any device attempting to connect to the network will be detected; only those devices that are compliant (e.g., anti-virus is up to date, approved configuration) will receive access to requested DAAS.

2.2 Device Detection and Compliance - Scenario

The following scenario illustrates the practical applications and considerations for this capability:

  • The Component deploys an asset management solution that continuously monitors all devices attempting to connect to the network, including Enterprise, mobile, IoT, and unmanaged devices.
  • A compliance-based network authorization process is implemented to ensure only secure devices can access Data, Applications, Assets, and Services (DAAS) or connect to the network. This process is enforced by Comply-to-Connect (C2C), which supports Zero Trust (ZT) by requiring all devices to continuously meet security baselines before being granted access to any resources.
  • Devices are evaluated against a compliance baseline that includes requirements such as up-to-date antivirus software, approved configurations, and recent patch status.
  • A mobile device with a jailbroken configuration is flagged by the system as non-compliant, triggering an alert for the Security Operations Center (SOC) and isolating the device from sensitive resources.
  • IoT devices, such as printers and cameras, are enrolled in the asset management system, and their compliance status is regularly monitored to prevent vulnerabilities from being exploited.
  • To enhance security, the Component integrates its asset management system with the Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP), ensuring that only devices linked to authenticated User/PEs are evaluated for compliance.
  • By employing device detection and compliance systems, the Component ensures that only secure and authorized devices gain access, preventing potential breaches.

Positive Impacts

The following is not a comprehensive list of benefits, but rather a selection of the advantages fundamental to this capability:

  • Enhanced Security
  • Improved Compliance Management
  • Streamlined Device Management
  • Increased Operational Efficiency

Technologies

The following is not a comprehensive list of technologies:

  • Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)
  • Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
  • Comply-to-Connect (C2C)
  • Device Health Monitoring
  • Network Access Control (NAC)
  • Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP)

Activity 2.2.1 - Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1

Activity 2.2.1 — Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Enterprise refines policy, standards, and requirements for Comply-to-Connect (C2C). Components implement and enforce compliance-based network authorization to meet ZT Target-level functionalities.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
2.1.2, 2.3.4, 2.4.2, 2.5.1 2.2.2
Expected Outcomes
  • C2C is enforced at the Component level for all environments.
  • All mandated devices checks are implemented using C2C at the Component level.
End State
A policy exists or is developed that dictates the need for all devices to be authorized, authenticated, and C2C compliant before connecting to the network.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Activity 2.1.2 (Phase One) – Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management, Activity 2.3.4 (Discovery) – Integrate Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C), Activity 2.4.2 (Phase Two) – Managed and Limited Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) Support, and Activity 2.5.1 (Phase One) – Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools, are defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as predecessors to this activity.
  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis prior to this activity, to leverage device inventory.
  • Presumption: The Enterprise has refined and established device policies, standards, and requirements before allowing environment access, as enforced by Comply-to-Connect (C2C).
  • The primary scope and objectives of implementing C2C, such as improvements in security, enforcing compliance, or eliminating unapproved access, have been clearly outlined.
  • Environments have been determined to be included in the initial rollout and subsequent Phases (e.g., low-risk, testing, production, etc.). Factors to consider include:
    • Integration with existing infrastructure
    • Automation capabilities
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Vendor support
    • Cost
  • Solutions are chosen to meet the Component’s evolving scalability, performance, and cybersecurity needs.
  • Activity 2.2.2 (Phase Three) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 2 is defined by the DoW ZT Framework as a successor to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.2.1 — Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1
Leverage the prioritized Hardware/Software List for integration with C2C.
Review and prioritize asset inventory:
  • Leverage approved Hardware/Software List for environment authentication, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
  • Ensure the list is up-to-date and accurately reflects the current device landscape.
  • Review and prioritize the Hardware/Software List based on Enterprise cybersecurity policies.
Perform C2C integration readiness testing:
  • Conduct a readiness assessment of all environments to identify dependencies and integration points.
  • Establish a baseline for environment performance, User/Person Entity (PE) activity, and device connections in all environments, as it is essential for measuring the impact of C2C implementation.
  • Consider scaling requirements for implementing C2C in higher-risk and mission-critical environments.
  • Engage stakeholders to verify and validate operational impacts and obtain approval for broader C2C implementation, as applicable.
Obtain Enterprise policies, standards, and requirements for C2C compliance and integration.
Obtain and review Enterprise policy guidance:
  • Engage with the Enterprise to acquire the latest C2C policies, standards, and requirements.
  • Review and analyze Enterprise C2C guidance to identify mandatory controls and compliance obligations.
Ensure C2C requirements align with existing Enterprise policy guidance:
  • Map C2C requirements to existing Component-level security policies and frameworks.
  • Identify policy gaps and areas where updates or new policies are required to align with Enterprise C2C mandates.
Consider stakeholder collaboration:
  • Collaborate with legal, compliance, and cybersecurity teams to ensure applied Component-level policies align with Enterprise guidance.
  • Document compliance matrices to track adherence to all Enterprise C2C requirements.
  • Provide guidance and training sessions for relevant stakeholders on updated Enterprise C2C policies and standards.
Integrate C2C with the Environment infrastructure.
Establish C2C integration success criteria:
  • Define clear and measurable success criteria for C2C integration.
  • Develop a phased rollout plan for C2C deployment in all environments, including rollback procedures.
  • Coordinate with stakeholders to minimize operational disruptions during integration.
  • Document lessons learned from the integration to inform broader C2C deployment efforts.
Verify and validate C2C integration and connection establishment:
  • Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the current environment infrastructure to identify integration touchpoints for C2C.
  • Ensure environment segmentation is in place to support staged C2C enforcement across all environments.
  • Deploy C2C Policy Enforcement Points (PEP) at critical environment interfaces (e.g., switches, routers, firewalls, control planes, etc.)
  • Configure C2C systems to interface with existing environment approval solutions (e.g., Identity Credential Access Management (ICAM) solutions, etc.), as applicable.
Verify and validate the environment performance:
  • Perform integration testing to verify and validate the environment performance, availability, and cybersecurity post-integration.
  • Implement logging and monitoring capabilities to track C2C activities and environment approval decisions.
  • Maintain documentation of integration architecture, including data flow diagrams and operational workflows.
Implement all C2C device checks to maintain compliance.
Confirm C2C device compliance checks:
  • Identify all device compliance checks specified by the Enterprise C2C policies (e.g., patch levels, configuration baselines, antivirus status, encryption settings, etc.).
  • Configure C2C solutions to perform automated compliance checks before environment access authorization.
Ensure comprehensive device checks:
  • Verify and validate that C2C device checks cover all endpoint types (e.g., Bring Your Own Device (BYOD), Internet of Things (IoT), cloud-based assets, etc.).
  • Ensure the C2C performs real-time, scheduled, and unscheduled compliance assessments.
  • Test the accuracy and completeness of compliance checks in many operational scenarios.
  • Implement access controls based on real-time compliance status (e.g., privileged access, restricted access, quarantine, etc.).
  • Establish procedures for non-compliant device remediation, including automated patching and configuration correction.
  • Provide end user guidance and technical support for resolving compliance failures.
Maintain C2C enforcement, monitoring, and reporting.
Verify and validate C2C enforcement:
  • Enable C2C enforcement policies to maintain compliance with Enterprise standards and policies across all environments.
  • Periodically conduct penetration tests and/or security assessments to verify and validate the efficacy of C2C enforcement.
Implement C2C compliance monitoring and reporting:
  • Review compliance failure reports and refine C2C policies and enforcement logic.
  • Iterate C2C enforcement policies based on feedback and operational data collected.
  • Prepare detailed reporting on C2C enforcement outcomes, highlighting lessons learned and best practices.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.2.1 (Phase Two) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1 of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on incorporating the implementation of a Comply-to-Connect (C2C) solution for low-risk and testing environments. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including the enforcement of C2C at the Component level across all environments and mandated device checks.

Activity 2.2.1 — Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1 - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is the C2C solution implemented for low-risk and testing environments?
  2. What basic device checks are implemented using C2C?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies, standards, and requirements for implementing C2C in low-risk and testing environments, aligning with Enterprise guidance and ensuring that established compliance criteria (e.g., device posture, up-to-date patches, antivirus, etc.) are clearly understood and enforced.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by integrating C2C with its network infrastructure through a planned approach, which involves inventorying assets, segmenting networks, configuring micro-segmentation, and implementing security controls, including Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Least Privilege, and continuous monitoring, among others. This approach establishes clear timelines, tests scenarios, and defines user acceptance criteria.
  • The Component provides evidence that mandated device checks are automated and continuously enforced by C2C solutions (e.g., Network Access Control (NAC), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), Identity and Access Management (IAM), etc.), performing ongoing compliance-based approval, detecting anomalies through behavioral analytics, and ensuring comprehensive logging and auditing capabilities to identify and remediate non-compliant devices.
  • The Component ensures that the C2C implementation includes periodic reviews and improvements to policies and procedures, guided by feedback, lessons learned, and emerging threats, thus continuously refining the compliance posture and maintaining relevance to evolving security and regulatory standards.
  • The Component maintains continuous monitoring and reporting of C2C enforcement at the device level, integrating health checks, Incident Response (IR) plans, and centralized logging to ensure ongoing visibility, accountability, and adherence to established compliance requirements throughout the Enterprise.
Expected Outcomes
  1. C2C is enforced at the Component level for all environments.
  2. All mandated devices checks are implemented using C2C at the Component level.

Capability 2.3 - Device Authorization with Real-Time Inspection

Capability 2.3 — Device Authorization with Real-Time Inspection
DoW CIO Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Pillar Capability
2 - Device 2.3 - Device Authorization with Real-Time Inspection
Description
DoW Components conduct foundational and extended device tooling (Next-Generation AV, AppControl, File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), etc.) integration to better understand the risk posture. Organizational PKI systems are integrated to expand the existing Enterprise PKI to devices as well. Lastly Entity Activity Monitoring is also integrated to identify anomalous activities.
Impact to ZT
Components can use policies to deny devices by default and explicitly allow access to DAAS resources only by devices that meet mandated configuration standards. Security threats identified are remediated faster through continuous activity inspection enables faster remediation of security threats.

2.3 Device Authorization with Real-Time Inspection - Scenario

The following scenario illustrates the practical applications and considerations for this capability:

  • The Component integrates foundational device security solutions, including Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV), Application Control, and File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), to assess the risk posture of all devices attempting network access.
  • The Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) solution is expanded to include device certificates, ensuring that all devices, including unmanaged and infrastructure devices, are uniquely identifiable and verifiable.
  • A deny-by-default policy is implemented, allowing network access only to devices that meet strict configuration and security standards.
  • A device attempting to connect is flagged as non-compliant due to missing a valid PKI certificate, and access is denied automatically.
  • During routine operations, EAM detects a device exhibiting unusual activity, such as frequent failed access attempts to restricted resources, and raises an alert for the security team.
  • The alert triggers an automated response that quarantines the device, isolates it from the network, and initiates further inspection.
  • The Component integrates the device security stack with the Comply-to-Connect (C2C) solution, ensuring that devices are continuously monitored and inspected throughout their session in alignment with Zero Trust (ZT) principles, not just at the point of entry.
  • By combining real-time inspection with robust device authorization policies, the Component enhances its ability to prevent unauthorized access and mitigate threats quickly.

Positive Impacts

The following is not a comprehensive list of benefits, but rather a selection of the advantages fundamental to this capability:

  • Comprehensive Risk Assessment
  • Enhanced Authentication and Trust
  • Early Threat Detection
  • Reduced Security Blind Spots
  • Data-Driven Security

Technologies

The following is not a comprehensive list of technologies:

  • File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
  • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
  • Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)
  • Network Access Control (NAC)
  • Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV)
  • Real-Time Monitoring

Activity 2.3.3 - Implement Application Control and File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) Tools

Activity 2.3.3 — Implement Application Control and File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) Tools
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components procure and implement File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) and application control (e.g., execution deny/allow listing, containment, isolation) solutions. FIM ensures any data altered is authorized, and unauthorized changes are detected by FIM. Application containment is used to isolate any suspicious behavior or permissions to prevent any malicious lateral movement, expanding the capabilities and response of traditional executable containment. Both FIMs and application containment continues the development of the Device, Data, and Application & Workload pillars.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None None
Expected Outcomes
  • Application control and FIM tooling is implemented on all service applications and endpoint devices with C2C orchestration.
  • EDR tooling covers maximum amount of services applications and endpoint devices.
End State
Components deploy FIM and application control tooling in alignment with EDR, SOAR, and UEM. C2C orchestration and regular control audits and alerts are in place.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Where applicable, Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM), and Comply-to-Connect (C2C) solutions should already be integrated into the environment before starting this activity.
  • Integrate appropriate Application Control (e.g., execution deny/allow listing, containment, isolation, etc.) and File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) solution(s) based on Enterprise policies and procedures.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.3.3 — Implement Application Control and File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) Tools
Plan and prepare for Application Control and FIM implementation.
Initial environment assessment:
  • Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the current Application Control landscape, identifying critical applications and file systems.
  • Identify directories and files containing data critical to the Component’s operation, security, and compliance and require continuous monitoring.
  • Define the scope of Application Control and FIM deployment, including endpoints, servers, and cloud environments.
  • Prioritize Application Control and FIM deployment based on Enterprise and/or Component-defined risk level/criticality.
Select Application Control and FIM solutions that align with Enterprise policies and procedures:
  • Define the overall security and compliance objectives for both Application Control and FIM, including preventing unapproved application execution, detecting malicious activity, and ensuring data integrity.
  • Identify stakeholders (e.g., Information Technology (IT) operations, security teams, application owners, etc.) and formal Enterprise structure.
  • Select Application Control and FIM tools compatible with the existing infrastructure and cybersecurity tools.
  • Develop a phased implementation plan with timelines, resource requirements, risk mitigation strategies, and rollback procedures.
Deploy Application Control tools.
Prepare the environment for solution integration:
  • Establish baseline application inventories by scanning systems for installed and running applications.
  • Define, monitor, and implement application whitelist, greylist, and blacklist policies.
  • Configure the Application Control solution to enforce the defined whitelist, greylist, and blacklists policies.
Based on environment needs, apply Indicators of Compromise (IoC) solutions and maintain application whitelist, greylist, and blacklist:
  • Integrate Application Control solutions with IoC solutions (e.g., Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), EDR, etc.).
  • During Application Control solution integration, follow Enterprise Application Control policies in a staged manner (e.g., audit mode before enforcement, etc.) to minimize operational disruption.
  • Conduct pilot testing in non-production environments to analyze impacts on environmental performance, User/Person Entity (PE) experience, and overall Component cybersecurity posture.
  • Regularly review and update the application whitelist, greylist, and blacklist based on operational needs and emerging threats.
Deploy FIM tools.
Prepare the environment for FIM solution integration:
  • Verify and validate critical files, directories, system configurations, and application binaries that require integrity monitoring.
  • Organize files based on their criticality, importance, and sensitivity to ensure the most critical files are prioritized for monitoring during FIM solution integration.
  • Deploy FIM solutions on targeted systems, ensuring coverage across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
Integrate FIM solutions to monitor data integrity:
  • Configure FIM solutions to monitor for altered data and unapproved changes (e.g., file modifications, additions, deletions, permission changes, etc.).
  • Establish real-time alerting and automated response mechanisms for critical file integrity violations.
  • Ensure integration of FIM solutions with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platforms for centralized log management and correlation.
  • Conduct baseline scans to establish a known, good state for monitored files and configurations.
Verify and validate Application Control and FIM efficacy.
Assess, review, and improve Application Control and FIM deployment:
  • Perform verification and validation testing by simulating unapproved application executions and file modifications.
  • Conduct security assessments and penetration testing to ensure the strength of implemented controls, as applicable.
  • Review Application Control and FIM alerts and adjust policies to reduce noise without compromising cybersecurity posture.
  • Analyze historical data from FIM to detect patterns of anomalous activity, potential insider threats, and/or Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs).
  • Implement continuous feedback loops with stakeholders to refine and optimize FIM configurations.
Integrate Application Control and FIM solutions with the broader security environment.
Supplement existing Enterprise cybersecurity strategies with the integration of Application Control and FIM solutions:
  • Ensure integration of Application Control and FIM solutions with existing EDR, SIEM, C2C, and network security solutions.
  • Configure automated workflows for Incident Response (IR) based on alerts from Application Control and FIM solutions.
  • Enable Role-Based Access Controls (RBACs) within Application Control and FIM solutions to control, monitor, and maintain privileged access.
  • Utilize Application Control and FIM solution data to enable continuous verification and validation for User/PE/Non-Person Entity (NPE) authentication.
Maintain Application Control and FIM solution management.
Manage Application Control and FIM solutions:
  • Define operational processes for managing Application Control and FIM solutions, including reviews and updates.
  • Schedule regular audits, integrity scans, and regulatory compliance checks to ensure continuous alignment with evolving Enterprise cybersecurity policies.
  • Perform root cause analysis for Application Control breaches and FIM alerts to continuously inform Enterprise cybersecurity policy refinement.
Monitor, optimize, and improve Application Control and FIM solutions:
  • Continuously develop and enact reporting mechanisms to track Application Control and FIM solution performance metrics (e.g., false positive rates, response times, etc.), incident trends, and Enterprise compliance status.
  • Adjust Application Control and FIM solution policies based on threat intelligence, operational feedback, and evolving Enterprise and regulatory compliance requirements.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.3.3 (Phase Two) – Implement Application Control and File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) Tools of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) and application control solutions. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including application control and FIM tooling implementation across all service applications and endpoint devices, with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) orchestration.

Activity 2.3.3 — Implement Application Control and File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) Tools - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How are FIM and Application Control solutions procured and implemented?
  2. How is the integration with Enterprise and organizational Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) environments achieved for application allowances?
  3. How is Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGenAV) tooling expanded to cover all possible services and applications?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for implementing FIM and application control measures, ensuring alignment with Enterprise security standards and requirements for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR), Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution, and C2C orchestration.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by deploying FIM tools to detect unapproved file changes, establishing baselines, and integrating with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems, as well as by implementing application control solutions that employ whitelisting, greylisting, blacklisting, and certificate-based allowances to isolate suspicious behavior and prevent lateral movement.
  • The Component provides evidence that these measures (FIM and application control) undergo continuous monitoring, regular audits, and policy updates, with training and tabletop exercises ensuring that Information Technology (IT) and security personnel can effectively respond to alerts, adapt to new threats, and maintain compliance with regulatory guidance.
  • The Component ensures that EDR solution is selected, deployed, and integrated to cover a broad range of services, applications, and endpoints, and that it aligns with Enterprise standards, supports scalability, and works seamlessly with existing security tools (e.g., SIEM, threat intelligence, etc.).
  • The Component continuously improves its overall security posture by conducting pilot deployments, verifying and validating configurations, reviewing logs and reports, performing after-action reviews, and incorporating lessons learned into refined policies and procedures, thereby maintaining compliance and adapting to evolving cyber threats.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Application control and FIM tooling is implemented on all service applications and endpoint devices with C2C orchestration.
  2. EDR tooling covers maximum amount of services applications and endpoint devices.

Activity 2.3.4 - Integrate Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C)

Activity 2.3.4 — Integrate Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C)
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Component procures and implements an Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). EPP should have the capabilities to use advanced analytics (e.g., artificial intelligence, behavioral detection, machine learning) to mitigate exploits (e.g., zero-day, signatureless, fileless), provide Network Access Control, and protect against known and unknown threats. These solutions are orchestrated with the C2C or EDR solution for baseline status checks of signatures, updates, etc.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None 2.2.1, 2.7.1
Expected Outcomes
  • Critical Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) data is being sent to C2C and EDR for checks.
  • EPP tooling is implemented on all critical services applications and endpoint devices.
End State
Advanced protection on endpoint devices against modern threats, while developing Automation & Orchestration, as well as Visibility & Analytics pillar, through AI, ML and behavior analysis.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis and Activity 3.1.1 (Discovery) – Application and Code Identification prior to this activity, to establish an Application Inventory.
  • Incorporate industry-recognized best practices for application security:
    • Regular patching and vulnerability remediation
    • Secure coding practices
    • Application whitelisting
    • Supply chain security
  • Consider Component requirements for Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions that have all necessary features, such as Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV), anti-malware, Comply-to-Connect (C2C), and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) interoperability.
  • Define critical EPP data to be shared with C2C and EDR, for example:
    • Device health status: Including operating system version, patch level, and antivirus status.
    • Application Inventory: List of installed applications.
    • Detected threats: Details of detected malware and other threats.
    • Security events: Logs of suspicious activity.
  • Activity 2.2.1 (Phase Two) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1 and Activity 2.7.1 (Phase One) – Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) are defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as successors to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.3.4 — Integrate Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C)
Evaluate and select an EPP solution based on Enterprise and Component procurement policies and procedures.
Identify Enterprise and Component procurement requirements and security compliance standards:
  • Review the Enterprise and Component procurement guidelines to ensure compliance with budgeting, vendor selection, and approval processes.
Assess EPP solutions for compatibility with existing infrastructure and security tools (e.g., C2C, EDR, etc.):
  • Document required controls for endpoint security (e.g., encryption, access control, auditing, Incident Response (IR), etc.).
  • Determine which standards the EPP should comply with (e.g., data protection, malware detection, remediation, etc.).
  • Identify potential EPP vendors based on market research to meet mission requirements and solution integration with existing infrastructure.
Select and procure an EPP solution based on performance, compliance, and cost analysis:
  • Use a structured process to evaluate vendors based on predefined criteria (e.g., functionality, support, scalability, vendor reputation, etc.).
  • Include cross-functional stakeholders (e.g., security operations, networking, procurement, etc.) in the review process, where applicable.
  • Conduct testing (e.g., performance, functionality, security, etc.) with selected EPP solutions on a sample set of critical endpoints, where applicable.
  • Based on performance testing, compliance analysis, and cost evaluation, select the EPP solution that best meets the Enterprise and Component needs.
Configure EPP to prepare to send data to C2C.
Establish secure data transfer:
  • Ensure data is encrypted prior to transferring sensitive EPP data in compliance with Least Privilege and data protection requirements.
  • Create secure data channels for EPP systems to communicate with the C2C environment at large to protect data in transit.
  • In preparation for successor Activity 2.2.1 (Phase Two) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1, configure access control to allow only approved endpoints to connect, and prepare to send data to the C2C.
  • Utilize Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) (e.g., Secure File Transfer Protocols (SFTPs), Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), Secure Shell (SSH), Transport Layer Security (TLS), etc.) for secure data transfer, where possible.
Define data types for transfer between the EPP and C2C:
  • Determine the types of data the EPP will send to the C2C (e.g., real-time EDR data, aggregated Extended Detection and Response (XDR) data, relevant security events, etc.).
  • Categorize data as real-time, periodic, or event-driven to optimize C2C ingestion.
  • Establish tagging schema for Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) enforcement.
  • Test the integration to ensure data flows correctly and is processed as expected.
Configure EPP to prepare to send data to EDR.
Configure EPP:
  • Verify and validate the configuration processes across the entire endpoint lifecycle, which may vary depending on the EPP and EDR solutions.
  • Configure the EPP to forward relevant data to the EDR solution:
    • Include forwarding alerts, raw telemetry data, policy violations, and user behavior analytics.
    • Verify and validate correlation in EDR dashboards and alerts.
Deploy and configure the EPP solution.
Asset inventory:
  • Leverage approved asset inventory, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
  • Verify and validate an inventory of all applications and devices within the Component’s environment to ensure the proper application and configuration of the EPP solution.
Implement EPP:
  • Deploy the EPP solution to all identified endpoints, ensuring complete coverage.
  • Leverage, verify, and validate the roles established through previous activities.
  • Ensure roles are properly assigned in the EPP.
  • Configure a comprehensive software solution with centralized control and management to maintain consistent policies across all defined endpoints.
Configure policies:
  • Configure the EPP policies to include strict application control, device control, and continuous monitoring.
  • Restrict the use of mobile code (e.g., ActiveX, Java, JavaScript, etc.) to prevent attackers from executing malicious code scripts.
Maintain regular updates:
  • Ensure protection against the latest threats by regularly performing software updates to the EPP and its threat intelligence database.
  • Schedule and execute validation checks (e.g., health status polling, hash validation, etc.).
  • Implement self-healing or rollback mechanisms for failed updates.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.3.4 (Discovery) – Integrate Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV). It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) data being sent to Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) for checks. Additionally, EPP tooling is included on all critical service applications and endpoint devices.

Activity 2.3.4 — Integrate Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is critical NextGen AV data sent to C2C for checks?
  2. How is NextGen AV tooling implemented on all critical services and applications?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for configuring EPP tools to securely transmit data (e.g., telemetry, alerts, file hashes, etc.) to the C2C environment, ensuring adherence to Enterprise security requirements and ZT principles.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by establishing secure, encrypted data transfer channels (e.g., Transport Layer Security (TLS), Secure Shell (SSH), etc.) between EPP solutions and C2C systems, verifying that data flows correctly and sensitive information remains protected against unapproved access or exposure.
  • The Component provides evidence that it integrates EPP with EDR tools, selecting platforms, refining policies, and configuring exploit protection settings to forward relevant alerts, suspicious events, and raw telemetry data for continuous threat monitoring.
  • The Component ensures full EPP coverage by identifying all applications and devices through a comprehensive asset inventory, deploying EPP software across endpoints, configuring policies (e.g., application and device control, restricted mobile code execution, etc.), and maintaining updated threat intelligence databases.
  • The Component continuously updates and audits its EPP configurations, patches, and policies, confirming that endpoint protection measures remain aligned with evolving threats, Component objectives, and established security standards while maintaining a robust ZT security posture.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Critical EPP data is being sent to C2C and EDR for checks.
  2. EPP tooling is implemented on all critical services applications and endpoint devices.

Capability 2.4 - Remote Access

Capability 2.4 — Remote Access
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Pillar Capability
2 - Device 2.4 - Remote Access
Description
DoW Components audit existing device access processes and tooling to set a least privilege baseline. In Phase Two this access is expanded to cover basic BYOD and IoT support using the Enterprise IdP for approved applications. The final Phases expand coverage to include all BYOD and IT devices for services using the approved set of device attributes.
Impact to ZT
Enables properly authorized and authenticated users and NPEs to access DAAS from remote locations.

2.4 Remote Access - Scenario

The following scenario illustrates the practical applications and considerations for this capability:

  • The Component conducts an audit of existing remote access processes and tooling, identifying gaps in security and setting a Least Privilege baseline for all remote connections.
  • A deny-by-default policy is implemented, ensuring only authorized User/Person Entities (PEs)/Non-Person Entities (NPEs) are allowed to establish remote connections.
  • The Component integrates its Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) with remote access systems, enabling secure access to approved applications for managed devices while enforcing strong authentication requirements.
  • Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) remote access policies are developed, and the necessary capabilities are deployed to provide secure, managed, and limited access to specific services following compliance verification.
  • A contractor requests remote access using a personal device. The system verifies the device’s compliance with required security attributes, such as updated antivirus and encryption, before granting limited access to approved and necessary resources.
  • The Component verifies and validates the success of the BYOD access controls by securely enabling multiple Users/PEs to work remotely without expanding the threat surface, ensuring Zero Trust (ZT) principles are upheld through identity-driven access and continuous device posture enforcement.
  • Later real-time monitoring of remote access sessions detect unusual activity from a User/PE’s personal device accessing an unusually high amount of Data, Applications, Assets, and Services (DAAS) resources. The session is automatically terminated, and the User/PE is required to re-authenticate.
  • The User/PE fails to re-authenticate and the suspicious activity comes to an end.
  • Post-incident analysis reveals that the unusual activity came from an unexpected geographic location and was an attempted session hijack. After review, the Component updates its remote access policies to include additional checks for location-based anomalies.
  • By establishing secure remote access policies which meet the operational needs of their environment, and by managing BYOD and IoT connections through the Enterprise IdP, the Component adheres to ZT principles, ensuring only authorized and compliant Users/PEs and devices can access DAAS from remote locations

Positive Impacts

The below is not a comprehensive list of benefits, but rather a selection of the advantages fundamental to this capability:

  • Strengthened Security Foundation
  • Controlled Expansion of Device Ecosystem
  • Consistent Security Enforcement
  • Improved User/PE Experience
  • Scalable Security Architecture

Technologies

The below is not a comprehensive list of technologies, but rather a selection fundamental to this capability:

  • Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASBs)
  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
  • Enterprise Mobility Management
  • Mobile Device Management (MDM)
  • Network Access Control (NAC)
  • Website Technologies

Activity 2.4.1 - Deny Device by Default Policy

Activity 2.4.1 — Deny Device by Default Policy
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Enterprise sets standards and requirements for overall policy, with Components tailoring them to their specific environments and mission requirements. Components will block access from all unmanaged remote and local devices to resources. Managed, compliant devices are provided riskbased, methodical access following ZT Target-level concepts.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
2.1.2 None
Expected Outcomes
  • Enterprise sets standards for Deny Device by Default policy.
  • Components will block unmanaged devices remotely/locally.
  • Access is enabled strictly for compliant devices remotely/locally following the "Deny Device by Default" policy approach.
End State
All device access is authorized, verified, and compliant and all other devices are blocked by default.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Activity 2.1.2 (Phase One) – Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management is defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as a predecessor to this activity.
  • Presumption: The Hardware/Software List from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis, is up to date and reflects the current environment.
  • Evaluate Enterprise device compliance policies to ensure they meet requirements before granting access to the Component environment.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.4.1 — Deny Device by Default Policy
Establish policies that follow Enterprise Deny Device by Default access standards and requirements.
Develop a Component-level Deny Device by Default policy:
  • Leverage existing Enterprise Deny Device by Default standards and requirements when developing Component-level Deny Device by Default policy.
  • Collaborate with the Enterprise to define access policies for both managed and unmanaged devices, ensuring a mutual understanding of enforcement expectations.
  • Ensure Component-level policies align with Enterprise standards and industry best practices for deny-by-default.
  • Map and tailor Enterprise Deny Device by Default requirements to the existing Component-level cybersecurity policies.
  • Include conditions for reclassification of devices as compliant or non-compliant based on posture validation tools (e.g., Comply-to-Connect (C2C), Enterprise Device Management (EDM), etc.).
Apply the Component-level Deny Device by Default policy:
  • Establish a baseline Component-level Deny Device by Default policy that denies access to all devices by default and blocks all unmanaged remote and local device access to all Component resources.
  • Define explicit permissions for each device and ensure that access permissions are granted based on the principle of Least Privilege.
  • Ensure policy-based access is conditional, risk-informed, and dynamically reassessed based on device posture changes.
  • Integrate policy into access control systems (e.g., Network Access Control (NAC), firewalls, endpoint security, etc.) for automated enforcement, where possible.
Manage devices outside the deny-by-default policy through risk-based exceptions.
Manage exceptions:
  • Devices outside the deny-by-default policy are:
    • Identified
    • Documented
    • Approved or Rejected
  • Approval is granted when justification for the exception outweighs the risks to the Enterprise/Component.
  • The Enterprise and/or Component determines risks.
  • Approval is periodically reassessed.
  • Maintain and regularly review a centralized exception register for audit and accountability.
  • All exceptions should include:
    • Risk justification
    • Temporary duration
    • Compensating controls (e.g., segmentation, limited access scope, etc.)
Verify and validate access for compliant devices.
Implement access control mechanisms:
  • Configure Access Control Lists (ACLs) for devices in the environment to enforce the Deny Device by Default policy, ensuring only compliant devices are granted access.
  • Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to manage access permissions based on User/Person Entity (PE)/Non-Person Entity (NPE) roles.
  • Utilize Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) to enforce access decisions based on User/PE/NPE attributes (e.g., identity, role, location, device security posture, etc.).
  • Document compliance matrices to track adherence to all Component-level Deny Device by Default requirements.
  • Verify and validate compliance status using posture assessment solutions integrated with C2C and/or Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) platforms.
  • Test controls under live scenarios (e.g., simulated unmanaged device access, etc.) to verify and validate enforcement accuracy.
Verify and validate that unmanaged devices are blocked remotely and locally.
Integrate continuous device monitoring and auditing:
  • Block access for all unmanaged remote and local devices to Component resources.
  • Continuous monitoring should be incorporated to track all access attempts, including denied connections from unmanaged or non-compliant devices.
  • Conduct regular audits to ensure compliance and identify gaps with Enterprise access control policies.
  • Use logging, alerting, and ticketing to document and respond to unapproved device access attempts.
  • Verify and validate blocking efficacy through routine risk assessments and/or threat emulation exercises, where possible.

Summary

The information below outlines the Activity 2.4.1 (Phase One) – Deny Device by Default Policy of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of a policy to block access to resources from unmanaged remote and local devices. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including the strict management of access for compliant devices locally and/or remotely in accordance with the policy standards set by the Enterprise.

Activity 2.4.1 — Deny Device by Default Policy - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is the deny device by default policy implemented to block unmanaged remote and local device access to resources?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines deny device by default policies by aligning with Enterprise standards, collaborating with stakeholders, and tailoring access control requirements to enforce strict device security measures.
  • The Component demonstrates security and compliance by establishing a policy baseline that denies all device access by default, implementing explicit access permissions based on the principle of Least Privilege, and verifying and validating that only compliant devices can connect to Component resources.
  • The Component provides verifiable enforcement through access control mechanisms such as Access Control Lists (ACLs), Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), and Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC), ensuring only approved and properly secured devices are permitted.
  • The Component leverages continuous monitoring, compliance tracking, and regular audits to detect and prevent unapproved access, integrating real-time device verification and validation with Enterprise security frameworks.
  • The Component ensures ongoing security by maintaining an adaptive policy framework, blocking unmanaged devices, and continuously assessing alignment with evolving Enterprise and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) deny-by-default standards.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Enterprise sets standards for Deny Device by Default policy.
  2. Components will block unmanaged devices remotely/locally.
  3. Access is enabled strictly for compliant devices remotely/locally following the Deny Device by Default policy approach.

Activity 2.4.2 - Managed and Limited Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) Support

Activity 2.4.2 — Managed and Limited Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) Support
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components utilize Enterprise Device Management Solution to ensure that managed Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) devices are fully integrated with Enterprise IdP. Enabling user and device-based authorization is supported. Device access requires dynamic access policies and the practice of Least Privilege.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None 2.2.1, 2.4.3
Expected Outcomes
  • All Component access must be governed by dynamic access permissions for BYOD and IoT devices.
  • Component BYOD and IoT device permissions are baselined and integrated with Enterprise IdP.
End State
Components establish a foundation for risk-based access control for BYOD and IoT with dynamic permissions.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis and Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1 can inform the implementation of an Enterprise Device Management (EDM) solution capable of managing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
  • Presumption: Dynamic access policies for device access to the Component environment should already be established.
    • Policies include consideration of device posture, user context, and resource sensitivity.
    • Define specific criteria for granting or denying access based on these factors.
  • Presumption: The Component has completed Activity 1.9.1 (Phase Two) – Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1, as this activity requires Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) integration.
  • Ensure Enterprise IdP is already configured, implemented, and fully operational before starting this activity.
  • Verify and validate the compatibility of EDM solutions with existing Information Technology (IT) infrastructure, including IdP, environment components, and other security solutions.
  • Ensure the EDM solution can scale to accommodate future growth, an evolving Component environment, and increased BYOD and IoT devices.
  • Regularly review and update Enterprise cybersecurity policies to address emerging threats and vulnerabilities specific to BYOD and IoT devices, such as mobile device management policies, IoT security guidelines, and data encryption requirements as they relate to mobile and IoT threats.
  • Integrate EDM solutions with threat intelligence feeds to stay informed about emerging threats, where applicable.
  • Implement alerts for suspicious activities, policy violations, or Indicators of Compromise (IoC), ensuring that dynamic access controls are working as intended, where applicable.
    • Examples include: Unapproved access attempts from BYOD or IoT devices, compromised device indicators, attempts to access restricted resources, and non-compliance with security policies.
  • Activity 2.2.1 (Phase Two) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1 and Activity 2.4.3 (Phase Three) – Managed and Full BYOD and IoT Support Part 1 are defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as successors to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.4.2 — Managed and Limited Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) Support
Develop Component EDM integration plan.
Develop an EDM integration plan:
  • Leverage approved Hardware/Software List for environment authentication, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
  • Leverage the Component EDM solution, from Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1.
  • Leverage existing Enterprise policies and procedures to develop requirements for managing the EDM.
  • Verify and validate the EDM solution supports BYOD and IoT and provides device management automation related to critical data and services.
  • Document any EDM deficiencies in accordance with the Enterprise's policies and implement an alternate solution as required for BYOD and IoT devices.
Manage BYOD and IoT devices that cannot be managed by the EDM solution through risk-based exceptions.
Manage exceptions:
  • BYOD and IoT devices incompatible with the EDM solution are:
    • Identified
    • Documented
    • Approved/Rejected
  • The Enterprise and/or Component determines risks.
  • Approval is granted when justification for the exception outweighs the risks to the Enterprise/Component.
  • Approval is periodically reassessed.
Integrate BYOD and IoT devices with the Enterprise IdP.
  • Configure EDM solution for BYOD and IoT device enrollment and integration with the Enterprise IdP for seamless authentication and approval.
  • Test the authentication process by logging in to a managed device (e.g., BYOD, IoT, etc.) to ensure proper integration and access control.
Establish BYOD and IoT device permission baselines and integrate them with the Enterprise IdP.
Define BYOD and IoT device access permissions based on the device baseline:
  • Identify and document the baseline access permissions for all BYOD and IoT devices that exist within the Component environment.
  • Establish role-based or device-specific permissions based on Enterprise and Component security policies.
Integrate BYOD and IoT device permissions with the Enterprise IdP:
  • Ensure device-specific access permissions are linked to User/PE/NPE profiles within the Enterprise IdP.
  • Configure and integrate the IdP to automatically synchronize User/PE/NPE identity data with device profiles, ensuring consistent and accurate adherence to access control policies.
Verify and validate permissions and perform cybersecurity audits:
  • Conduct testing to ensure the baseline permissions are applied correctly for each BYOD and IoT device and the Enterprise IdP is enforcing the correct access rights.
  • Audit device access logs and permissions regularly to ensure any deviations from the baselines are promptly addressed, maintaining Enterprise and Component security and compliance.
Establish risk-based access control for BYOD and IoT devices with dynamic permissions.
Define risk-based access control criteria:
  • Establish risk-based access controls that consider factors like device health, compliance status, User/PE/NPE behavior, and environmental context (e.g., location, network conditions, etc.).
  • To maintain a healthy cybersecurity posture, document risk levels and map them to specific access permissions or restrictions for BYOD and IoT devices.
Adjust permissions dynamically based on risk assessment results:
  • Configure Access Control List(s) (ACL(s)) to dynamically adjust device access permissions based on real-time risk assessments (e.g., deny access for non-compliant or unmanaged devices, etc.).
Test and monitor risk-based Access Controls:
  • Test the implementation of risk-based access controls to verify and validate dynamic permission changes.
  • Set up monitoring and alerting systems to track deviations from expected access patterns, ensuring the Access Control system adapts effectively to emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
Implement dynamic Access Control for all BYOD and IoT devices within the Component environment.
Implement dynamic Access Control policies:
  • Implement dynamic access control policies based on device type, User/Person Entity (PE)/Non-Person Entity (NPE) role, and security posture (e.g., device health, compliance status, etc.).
  • Ensure the policies are adaptable, allowing real-time adjustments based on location, time of access, and/or device status.
Integrate device status into Access Control policies:
  • Configure the system to collect and use real-time device status (e.g., device type, operating system, security compliance, etc.) to determine and control access levels.
  • Ensure that the access permissions are automatically adjusted based on the status (e.g., denying access for non-compliant and/or unmanaged devices, etc.).
Enable real-time monitoring and auditing:
  • Configure and apply the established EDM solution to track and audit access requests made by BYOD and IoT devices to critical services, applications, and devices within the environment.
Test, verify, and validate dynamic Access Controls:
  • Perform testing with BYOD and IoT devices to ensure dynamic access control policies are correctly enforced in various scenarios.
  • Verify and validate access is granted or denied according to the dynamic rules, based on the current status of the device and compliance with Enterprise policies.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.4.2 (Phase Two) – Managed and Limited Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) Support of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of policies to closely manage devices introduced into the Enterprise Identity Provider (IdP) environment. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including Component Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) device permissions governed by dynamic access permissions.

Activity 2.4.2 — Managed and Limited Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) Support - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How are managed BYOD and IoT devices integrated with the Enterprise IdP to support User/Person Entity (PE) and device-based authorization?
  2. How are dynamic access policies enforced for all applications requiring device access?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines a Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution strategy by aligning with Enterprise policies, conducting gap analysis, and developing a structured approach for managing BYOD and IoT integration.
  • The Component demonstrates security and compliance by implementing dynamic access control policies, integrating device health assessments, and enforcing real-time authentication approval through the Enterprise IdP.
  • The Component provides verifiable enforcement through continuous monitoring, access audits, and dynamic risk-based controls, ensuring that device permissions are consistently applied and automatically adjusted based on compliance status and security posture.
  • The Component leverages real-time device status data, automated synchronization with IdP profiles, and security baselines to enforce adaptive access control mechanisms and mitigate risks associated with unmanaged or non-compliant devices.
  • The Component ensures ongoing security by establishing cybersecurity audits, testing risk-based access controls, and continuously refining UEDM policies to align with evolving Enterprise security frameworks and threat landscapes.
Expected Outcomes
  1. All Component access must be governed by dynamic access permissions for BYOD and IoT devices.
  2. Component BYOD and IoT device permissions are baselined and integrated with Enterprise IdP.

Capability 2.5 - Partially and Fully Automated Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management

Capability 2.5 — Partially and Fully Automated Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management
DoW CIO Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Pillar Capability
2 - Device 2.5 - Partially and Fully Automated Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management
Description
DoW Components establish processes to automatically test and deploy vendor patches for connected devices; hybrid patch management (both human and automated) is employed.
Impact to ZT
Risk is minimized by automatically deploying vendor patches to all network devices.

2.5 Partially and Fully Automated Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management - Scenario

The following scenario illustrates the practical applications and considerations for this capability:

  • The Component implements asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions to maintain an up-to-date inventory of connected devices, including their patch and vulnerability statuses.
  • A hybrid patch management process is established, combining automated and human oversight to ensure vendor patches are tested and deployed efficiently without disrupting operations.
  • The Component configures automated solutions to continuously scan vendor feeds for critical patches and match them against its device inventory to identify affected devices.
  • During a routine scan, the solutions detect a critical vulnerability affecting multiple network devices and prioritize these devices for immediate patching.
  • Automated systems deploy the patch to non-critical devices in a sandbox environment for testing while human administrators review the results to ensure the patch does not introduce issues.
  • Upon successful testing, the patch is rolled out to critical devices across the network, with the automated system monitoring deployment progress and verifying and validating successful installation.
  • The Component's security solutions detect a rogue device attempting to exploit the now-patched vulnerability but fail to gain access due to the updated patch status of all compliant devices.
  • Vulnerability scans confirm that the Component’s patching efforts have closed the critical security gap, reducing the network's overall risk.
  • The Component schedules periodic audits to review the effectiveness of its patch management process, ensuring the hybrid approach adapts to emerging threats and technology changes.
  • The Component minimizes risk by automating asset, vulnerability, and patch management processes and ensures timely deployment of vendor patches.

Positive Impacts

The below is not a comprehensive list of benefits, but rather a selection of the advantages fundamental to this capability:

  • Significantly Reduced Vulnerability Exposure
  • Increased Operational Efficiency
  • More Consistent Patch Coverage
  • Enhanced Resilience Against Emerging Threats
  • Optimized Resource Utilization

Technologies

The following is not a comprehensive list of technologies:

  • Configuration Management Databases (CMDBs)
  • IT Asset Management (ITAM) Software
  • Patch Management Solutions
  • Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) Solutions
  • Vulnerability Management Solutions
  • Website Technologies

Activity 2.5.1 - Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools

Activity 2.5.1 — Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components implement solution(s) for managing asset/device configurations, vulnerabilities, and patches. Using minimum compliance standards (e.g., STIGs, C2C, UEM, etc.), teams can confirm or deny managed device compliance. As part of the procurement and implementation process for solutions, APIs or other programmatic interfaces will be in scope for future levels of automation and integration.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None 2.2.1, 3.2.3
Expected Outcomes
  • Components can confirm if devices meet minimum compliance standards or not.
  • Component solutions enable integration across asset management, vulnerability, and patching systems while considering automation capabilities.
End State
Continuously identify and address vulnerabilities, manage assets effectively, and apply necessary patches to mitigate potential threats and maintain a secure environment.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis prior to this activity, to obtain an accurate device inventory list.
  • Prioritize asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions that offer robust Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) or other programmatic interfaces. This will enable automation and integration with other security solutions (e.g., Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR), Comply-to-Connect (C2C), etc.).
  • Ensure that asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions selections are interoperable with existing and evolving system solutions (e.g., Enterprise Device Management (EDM), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), threat intelligence platforms, etc.). Consider using standardized data formats and communication protocols to facilitate integration.
  • Create a configuration management plan and document all interactions between products so the secondary effects of unintended consequences of upgrades are understood.
  • Determine each solution’s criticality with respect to how it affects Users/Person Entities (PEs)/Non-Person Entities (NPEs) in the environment to help determine updates, as appropriate.
  • When selecting asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions, consider scalability, integration, automation, compliance, and cost.
  • Activity 2.2.1 (Phase Two) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1 and Activity 3.2.3 (Phase Two) – Automate Application Security and Code Remediation Part 1 are defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as successors to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.5.1 — Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools
Evaluate the Component system to ensure it meets Enterprise security compliance requirements.
Review and prioritize asset inventory:
  • Leverage the approved Hardware/Software List for Environment authentication and approval, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
  • Ensure the list is up-to-date and accurately reflects the current assets in the Environment.
  • Review and prioritize the Hardware/Software List based on Enterprise cybersecurity policies.
  • Perform gap analysis between existing security policies for asset, vulnerability, patch management, and Enterprise requirements.
Establish evaluation criteria for the Component system:
  • Develop specific evaluation criteria for the Component system based on Enterprise asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions compliance requirements (e.g., asset inventory accuracy, vulnerability assessment frequency, patch deployment availability, etc.).
  • Establish baseline standards for each criterion to measure compliance in accordance with the existing Enterprise policies (e.g., Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs), C2C, Unified Endpoint Management (UEM), etc.).
Choose evaluation solutions and methods:
  • Select appropriate cybersecurity assessment, compliance management platforms, and auditing solutions/technologies for evaluating Component compliance with Enterprise policies.
  • Determine preferred methods for conducting the evaluation. (e.g., manual audits, automated scans, interviews with key personnel, etc.).
Perform asset, vulnerability, and patch management solution integration readiness testing:
  • Conduct a readiness assessment of all Component environments to identify dependencies and integration points for the asset, vulnerability, and patch tooling solutions.
Conduct asset management testing:
  • Conduct manual audits to cross-check the inventory against physical assets and other data sources.
  • Use automated discovery solutions to verify and validate the accuracy and completeness of the asset inventory.
Conduct vulnerability management testing:
  • Review the vulnerability assessment schedule to ensure that testing meets Enterprise compliance requirements.
  • Confirm vulnerability scanning solutions are properly configured to identify asset, system, and application weaknesses.
  • Ensure identified vulnerabilities are assessed for criticality to maintain a secure environment.
Conduct patch management testing:
  • Verify and validate the system which monitors vendor announcements, security advisories, and threat intelligence sources to identify available patches and updates, where applicable.
  • Verify and validate that patch releases are tested in a timely manner and pushed in a controlled environment to ensure compatibility and stability prior to deployment.
  • Verify and validate patches have been applied and known vulnerabilities are remediated.
Implement and integrate management tools.
Confirm asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions compliance checks:
  • Identify all asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions compliance checks as specified by Enterprise policies (e.g., asset inventory accuracy, vulnerability scanning, patch levels, configuration baselines, antivirus status, encryption settings, etc.).
  • Configure asset, vulnerability, and patch management tooling solutions to perform compliance checks using available APIs or integration mechanisms. Where APIs are not yet fully implemented, design configurations to support future automation and integration capabilities prior to environment access approval.
  • Configure asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions to interface with existing network approval solutions systems (e.g., SIEM, etc.), endpoint protection solutions, and Incident Response (IR) platforms.
Leverage asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions to identify and address vulnerabilities, manage devices, and apply necessary patches:
  • Implement continuous monitoring to identify and address vulnerabilities, manage assets effectively, and apply necessary patches to mitigate potential threats and maintain a secure environment.
  • Conduct regular reviews of the asset, vulnerability, and patch management processes to identify areas for improvement, and verify and validate the efficacy of the solution's enforcement.
  • Establish procedures for non-compliant device remediation, including automated patching and configuration correction.
  • Provide guidance and technical support for resolving compliance failures.
Leverage or establish a vulnerability management and governance board.
Leverage existing, or build, a comprehensive vulnerability management team:
  • Establish policy, assign responsibilities, and provide guidelines for participation in the Component Vulnerability Management Process.
Vulnerability triage and reporting:
  • Develop technical analysis and remediation capabilities to select and prioritize vulnerabilities based on severity, exploitability, exposure, and compliance requirements.
  • Empower the vulnerability management team to receive vulnerability reports from approved sources, coordinate and investigate to identify vulnerable systems, share findings reports with approved stakeholders for actions, and disseminate advisories and security bulletins on found vulnerabilities to the broader community as appropriate.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.5.1 (Phase One) – Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of tools to confirm compliance across asset, vulnerability, and patch management. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including component solutions that enable the integration of tools to test whether compliance standards are being met, and facilitate integration across systems.

Activity 2.5.1 — Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How are asset, vulnerability, and patch management tools implemented to confirm if devices meet minimum compliance standards?
  2. How are asset management, vulnerability, and patching systems integrated across systems using Application Programming Interfaces (APIs)?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines evaluation criteria and compliance standards for system security by aligning with Enterprise asset, vulnerability, and patch management policies, ensuring adherence to established cybersecurity requirements.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by integrating approved asset management tools, conducting vulnerability assessments, and verifying and validating patch deployment processes to maintain a secure and up-to-date environment.
  • The Component provides verifiable enforcement through continuous monitoring, compliance checks, and integration of asset, vulnerability, and patch management solutions, ensuring security baselines are met before network access is granted.
  • The Component leverages Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), endpoint protection, and Incident Response (IR) platforms to automate security enforcement, track system health, and efficiently remediate vulnerabilities.
  • The Component ensures ongoing security by performing regular compliance audits, refining remediation processes for non-compliant devices, and continuously updating security configurations to align with evolving Enterprise cybersecurity policies.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Components can confirm if devices meet minimum compliance standards or not.
  2. Component solutions enable integration across asset management, vulnerability, and patching systems while considering automation capabilities.

Capability 2.6 - Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and Mobile Device Management (MDM)

Capability 2.6 — Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and Mobile Device Management (MDM)
DoW CIO Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Pillar Capability
2 - Device 2.6 - Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and Mobile Device Management (MDM)
Description
DoW Components establish a centralized UEM solution that provides the choices of agent and/or agentless management of computer and mobile devices to a single console regardless of device location. DoW-issued devices can be remotely managed and security policies are enforced.
Impact to ZT
DAAS resources are protected through agent and agentless management, IT is able to manage, secure, and deploy resources and applications on any device from a single console to provide redress of cybersecurity threats. Security vulnerabilities are mitigated and policy enforcement measures are received through IT remote management of DoW-issued mobile devices.

2.6 Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and Mobile Device Management (MDM) - Scenario

The following scenario illustrates the practical applications and considerations for this capability:

  • The Component implements a centralized Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solution, enabling agent and agentless management of all computer and mobile devices through a single console.
  • Security policies are configured in the UEM solution to enforce device compliance, such as requiring encryption, up-to-date antivirus software, and secure configurations.
  • Information Technology (IT) administrators use the UEM solution to remotely manage Enterprise/Component issued devices, applying patches, deploying applications, and monitoring compliance status regardless of device location.
  • An Enterprise/Component issued mobile device is reported lost by a User/Person Entity (PE), and the IT team uses the UEM solution to remotely lock the device, wiping sensitive data to prevent unauthorized access.
  • During a routine compliance scan, the UEM solution detects a non-compliant device with outdated security patches and restricts its access to Data, Applications, Assets, and Services (DAAS) resources until the issue is resolved.
  • A malicious actor attempts to connect a rogue mobile device to the network, but the UEM solution, operating under Zero Trust (ZT), automatically blocks unregistered and unverified devices from gaining access.
  • The Component leverages the UEM solution to deploy a critical security update to all managed devices within hours of a vendor vulnerability announcement, reducing exposure to potential exploits.
  • IT administrators monitor real-time analytics in the UEM console, detecting unusual device behavior, such as unauthorized application installations, and taking corrective action.
  • Regular audits of the UEM solution ensure that all security policies remain effective and that emerging vulnerabilities are quickly addressed.
  • By centralizing device management through the UEM solution, the Component ensures DAAS resources are protected, security vulnerabilities are mitigated, and policies are enforced remotely.

Positive Impacts

The below is not a comprehensive list of benefits, but rather a selection of the advantages fundamental to this capability:

  • Streamlined Device Management
  • Location-Independent Security Control
  • Enhanced Operational Visibility
  • Improved Security Posture
  • Increased Administrative Efficiency

Technologies

The following is not a comprehensive list of technologies:

  • Asset/Device/Endpoint Management Solutions
  • Device Health Monitoring Technologies
  • Enterprise Mobility Management
  • Mobile Device Management (MDM)
  • Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Solutions

Activity 2.6.1 - Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools

Activity 2.6.1 — Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components will work closely with the "Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools" activity to procure and implement a Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution ensuring that requirements are integrated with the procurement process. Once a solution is procured the UEDM team(s) ensure that critical ZT Target-level functionalities such as minimum compliance, asset management, and API support are in place
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None 2.3.6
Expected Outcomes
  • Components can confirm if devices meet minimum compliance standards or not.
  • Components have asset management system(s) for user devices (phones, desktops, laptops) that maintains IT compliance, which is reported up to DoW Enterprise.
  • Components asset management systems can programmatically (i.e., API) provide device compliance status and if it meets minimum standards.
End State
UEDM implementation enables effective patch management and configuration baselines. It also provides an ability to deny/quarantine devices remotely that are not in compliance.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Consider completing Activity 2.5.1 – (Phase One) Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools prior to this activity, to identify individual Component solution requirements and procurement processes. Careful coordination is essential to ensure successful Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) implementation:
    • Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the Component's specific environment requirements and technical constraints.
    • Thoroughly review and understand the Enterprise procurement policies, timelines, and approval workflows.
    • Establish early collaboration with procurement stakeholders to identify UEDM solutions that offer seamless integration capabilities with existing infrastructure.
    • Coordinate procurement timelines with implementation schedules to ensure the selected UEDM solution is acquired and available when needed for deployment.
  • Components should consider developing a remediation plan for non-compliant devices (e.g., marking the device as non-compliant, remotely locking the device, denying network access, quarantining the device, etc.) and communicating directly with the device owner regarding non-compliance.
  • Activity 2.3.6 (Phase Three) – Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Part 1 is defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as a successor to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.6.1 — Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools
Identify and implement a UEDM solution.
Develop a UEDM integration plan:
  • Integrate requirements, from Activity 2.5.1 – (Phase One) Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools, to develop a strategy for integrating asset, vulnerability, and patch management tools with the UEDM solution.
Configure UEDM solutions:
  • Configure the UEDM solution to discover and inventory all endpoints and devices.
  • Establish signatures and baseline behaviors for devices within the environment.
  • Configure the vulnerability management tool to perform regular scans and assessments.
  • Configure the patch management tool to handle patch deployment and testing.
  • Ensure interoperability between solutions to ensure a hardened security posture.
Implement an asset management system.
Develop an asset management integration plan:
  • Leverage and review the established Enterprise strategy as a blueprint, where applicable, for integrating the asset management system with other security tools and systems within the infrastructure.
  • Verify and validate security policies are in place to protect the assets and User/Person Entity (PE)/Non-Person Entity (NPE) devices throughout the integration process.
Configure asset management solutions:
  • Configure the asset management solution to identify and inventory all User/PE/NPE devices.
  • Implement configuration management policies to ensure all User/PE/NPE devices are securely configured and compliant with Component guidelines and standards.
  • Configure the asset management solution to collect the necessary data points (e.g., timestamp configurations, logs, operating systems, etc.) for compliance reporting.
  • Configure reporting templates to align with Component requirements, including the required data fields and formats.
Integrate tools where applicable:
  • Ensure tool interoperability across multiple systems within the Component.
Verify and validate the Component capability for compliance reporting in alignment with Enterprise standards.
Maintain Enterprise compliance through continuous monitoring, reporting, and asset management:
  • Ensure all devices meeting minimum compliance and integration requirements are enrolled in a Component-wide asset management system capable of tracking configuration, compliance posture, and lifecycle data.
  • Document and maintain a plan for enrolling remaining devices as they achieve required compliance and integration readiness.
  • Regularly review and apply Enterprise standards and requirements for continuous monitoring and reporting, ensuring all systems meet or exceed baseline expectations.
  • Monitor device compliance (e.g., patch levels, software inventory, security configurations, etc.) to verify and validate ongoing adherence to policy requirements.
  • Routinely confirm that all systems and devices maintain valid Authorizations to Operate (ATOs) and operate within approved security parameters.
Generate compliance reports and submit reports to the appropriate authorities:
  • Conduct functional testing to ensure operational compliance reporting meets Enterprise guidance and requirements.
  • Generate and submit required compliance reports to the Enterprise, ensuring visibility and accountability for all managed assets utilizing the asset management solution.
  • Review reports for accuracy and completeness.
  • Confirm that the Enterprise received the compliance reports and gather feedback on the reporting process.
Verify and validate ZT Target-level functionalities.
Verify and validate Enterprise compliance requirements:
  • Leverage and review Enterprise regulatory guidance and documentation that identifies critical ZT Target functionalities and minimum requirements necessary for compliance.
  • Conduct functional testing to ensure minimum compliance requirements are met.
  • Conduct security testing to identify and mitigate any vulnerabilities in the compliance validation process.
  • Verify and validate the hardware, software, and services of physical and virtual platforms are managed in compliance with the Component’s risk strategy (e.g., Comply-to-Connect (C2C), etc.).
  • Verify and validate that log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.6.1 (Phase One) – Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of device compliance and asset management through a Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including programmatically managed asset compliance.

Activity 2.6.1 — Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solution implemented to ensure critical ZT functionalities such as minimum compliance and asset management?
  2. How are asset management systems for User/Person Entity (PE) devices maintained to report Information Technology (IT) compliance?
  3. How does the UEM solution support Application Programming Interface (API) integration for device compliance status?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for selecting and implementing a UEDM solution that integrates asset, vulnerability, and patch management capabilities in accordance with Enterprise guidance and ZT requirements.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by deploying UEDM tools that discover, inventory, and continuously monitor endpoints, integrating with vulnerability scanners, patch management systems, and asset management solutions to ensure the integrity, currency, and protection of hardware and software.
  • The Component provides evidence that data exchange between solutions (e.g., via APIs, etc.) is secure, with authenticated and encrypted channels protecting data at rest, in transit, and in use, maintaining Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (CIA) and adhering to backup, logging, and auditing mandates.
  • The Component ensures that continuous monitoring and reporting are in place, leveraging realtime visibility into endpoint configurations, anomalies, and compliance checks. It also ensures that alerts and event logs are fed into Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and other security platforms for timely detection and response.
  • The Component verifies and validates that the chosen UEDM solutions meet critical ZT target functionalities (e.g., minimum compliance levels, asset management, API support, etc.) and regularly audits, refines, and updates these tools, documenting lessons learned and maintaining resilient, policy-aligned cybersecurity operations.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Components can confirm if devices meet minimum compliance standards or not.
  2. Components have asset management system(s) for user devices (phones, desktops, laptops) that maintains IT compliance, which is reported up to DoW Enterprise.
  3. Components asset management systems can programmatically (i.e., API) provide device compliance status and if it meets minimum standards.

Activity 2.6.2 - Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1

Activity 2.6.2 — Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Enterprise sets standards and policies for Enterprise Device Management (EDM). Components migrate the manual device inventory to an automated approach using an EDM solution. Approved devices are able to be managed regardless of location. Devices part of critical services are managed by the EDM solution supporting automation.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
None 2.1.2, 2.6.3, 3.4.1
Expected Outcomes
  • Enterprise sets standards and policies for EDM.
  • Components manual inventory is integrated with an automated management solution for critical services.
  • Components enable ZT device management (from any location with or without remote access).
  • Where applicable, ensure tracking of NPEs in the UEM solution.
End State
Implementing consistent and well-defined processes and controls for managing devices.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis prior to this activity, as a complete device inventory is needed in order to select and implement an Enterprise Device Management (EDM) solution.
  • If Activity 2.6.1 (Phase One) – Implement Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) or Equivalent Tools has been completed prior to this activity, then ensure that the Component aligns actions within this activity with previous device management actions.
  • EDM policies should consider including guidelines for data collection and how the data is stored, used, shared, and/or destroyed in compliance with relevant privacy regulations and data protection policies.
  • Cross-platform support should be implemented for managed devices across multiple operating systems. Consider the level of management and security features available for each platform.
  • Centralized management should provide a single console for managing all devices including capabilities for policy deployment, software distribution, patch management, and security monitoring.
  • Security compliance ensures all devices meet security standards and policies.
  • Remote support and control provide Information Technology (IT) teams troubleshooting and remote management of devices.
  • Activity 2.1.2 (Phase One) – Non-Person Entity (NPE) and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), Device Under Management, Activity 2.6.3 (Phase Two) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 2, and Activity 3.4.1 (Phase One) – Resource Authorization Part 1 are defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as successors to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.6.2 — Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1
Obtain Enterprise EDM standards and policies and develop an EDM integration plan.
Develop a comprehensive EDM integration plan:
  • Review current Enterprise-level policies and procedures related to data management, including data standards, metadata management, data quality, data sharing, and security/privacy requirements.
  • Define technical and operational requirements needed to integrate EDM into Component systems, including:
    • Data exchange standards (e.g., Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), data models)
    • Metadata tagging and cataloging processes
    • Data lineage and auditability expectations
    • Role-Based Access Controls (RBACs) and data ownership models
  • Identify where existing policies fall short in supporting EDM integration (e.g., lack of interoperability standards, insufficient metadata requirements, etc.) and recommend updates or new policy development.
  • Outline phased steps for EDM integration, including key milestones, responsible stakeholders, data systems in scope, and timelines.
Obtain and review inventory:
  • Review and utilize the current manual device inventory system and Component Master Device Inventory, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
Deploy an EDM solution based on the integration plan:
  • Document any EDM deficiencies in accordance with Component and Enterprise policies and implement an alternate solution as required.
Migrate the manual device inventory to an automated process using the EDM solution, where applicable.
Develop migration plan:
  • Develop a strategy for migrating the manual device inventory to an automated process using the EDM solution.
Prepare manual inventory data:
  • Consolidate manual inventory data from all sources into a standardized format and clearly document the data fields and their meaning.
  • Compare the manual inventory data against other data sources (e.g., Active Directory, network scans, etc.). Manually verify a sample of devices to ensure accuracy. Address any discrepancies or missing information before proceeding with the migration.
Confirm configuration of the EDM solution:
  • Configure the EDM solution to support various enrollment methods (e.g., self-service enrollment, automated enrollment, and bulk enrollment). Configure device management policies and security baselines.
  • Configure the inventory settings to collect the required data fields and update frequency.
  • Configure the EDM solution to log all data input and changes to the device inventory. Enable audit logging to track user actions and system events.
Import manual inventory data:
  • Import the verified and validated manual inventory data into the EDM solution using the EDM import options.
  • Map and document the data fields from the manual inventory to the corresponding fields in the EDM solution to ensure data integrity and consistency.
  • Verify the imported device inventory in the EDM by comparing it to the original manual inventory, resolving any discrepancies before proceeding.
Enable ZT device management on all devices, regardless of physical or virtual location.
Establish requirements:
  • Determine which EDM features will be used for ZT device management (e.g., device posture checks, compliance enforcement, conditional access, etc.).
  • Define the scope of device management (e.g., devices, operating systems, locations, etc.).
  • Outline the integration with other security tools, such as:
    • Identity Provider (IdP), from Activity 1.3.1 (Phase One) – Organizational Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and Identity Provider (IdP) and Activity 1.9.1 (Phase Two) – Enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Identity Provider (IdP) Part 1.
    • Comply-to-Connect (C2C), from Activity 2.2.1 (Phase Two) – Implement Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Compliance-Based Network Authorization Part 1.
    • Proxy Enforcement Points, from Activity 5.3.1 (Phase One) – Datacenter Macro-Segmentation.
  • Define the requirements for supporting ZT principles managing devices with and without remote access:
    • Strong device authentication
    • Device health checks
    • Data encryption
    • Least Privilege access control
  • Develop and document a remote access plan for accessing systems through approved managed access points.
Configure device management solution:
  • Configure the EDM solution to enroll and manage all devices, regardless of the device procurement and/or location.
  • Ensure all remote access to systems is routed through designated access control points that are explicitly approved by the Component, centrally managed, and configured to enforce security policies (e.g., Virtual Private Network (VPN) gateways, secure jump servers, or ZT Network Access solutions).
  • Integrate the EDM with Network Access Control (NAC) solutions to enforce device registration before granting network access.
  • Implement security policies and Enterprise compliance requirements within the EDM solution.
  • Leverage 3rd party device management solutions to monitor and enforce policies, regardless of the device’s physical location, as needed.
  • Configure the EDM to assign unique device identities and use these identities for authentication and authorization purposes.
Enable tracking of Non-Person Entities (NPEs) within the EDM solution.
Establish device management requirements:
  • Define the requirements for identifying, inventorying, and managing devices running NPEs within the EDM solution. Requirements should include the ability to:
    • Automatically discover and identify NPE devices on the network.
    • Assign unique identifiers to NPEs.
    • Track NPE attributes (e.g., device type, operating system, location, etc.).
    • Monitor NPE activity.
    • Enforce security policies and compliance checks on NPEs.
Validate EDM solution capabilities:
  • Verify and validate the EDM solution provides comprehensive NPE management, monitoring, and compliance capabilities.
Develop an EDM implementation plan:
  • Develop a strategy for enabling tracking of NPEs within the EDM solution:
    • Define the scope of NPE tracking.
    • Determine how NPEs will be identified and inventoried.
    • Outline the integration with other security solutions.
    • Define device enrollment policies with device tagging.
    • Create a Least Privileged device baseline.
    • Develop a timeline and resource plan for implementation.
  • Use a consistent device tagging strategy and leverage tags to categorize and manage NPEs based on their function, location, or criticality.
Implement continuous monitoring and automation:
  • Schedule continuous monitoring to track devices running NPEs (e.g., network activity, system logs, security events, etc.).
  • Continuously verify that NPEs maintain compliance with security policies and have appropriate access rights.
  • Integrate the EDM solution with IT Service Management (ITSM) systems to automate change requests, incident management, and problem resolution for NPEs.
  • Implement automation to streamline processes such as device enrollment, inventory updates, and compliance checks.
Test, monitor, and audit NPE solutions.
Test, verify, and validate:
  • Verify and validate the NPEs’ capability to authenticate and access resources as required.
  • Verify and validate secure communications.
  • Perform security testing to identify and mitigate any vulnerabilities found during the automation implementation of critical services and associated devices processes.
Monitor and audit:
  • Monitor the NPE tracking solution to ensure its security and performance.
  • Conduct regular audits to verify compliance with security requirements to identify and respond to any potential issues.
  • Automate security assessments for NPEs, including vulnerability scans, compliance checks, and actions like quarantining or blocking threats.
  • Enforce and document audit logs utilizing audit logging tools.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1 of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of device inventory and management integration with a Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution for critical services. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including the integration of manual inventory with an automated management solution based on Enterprise standards.

Activity 2.6.2 — Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1 - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is the manual device inventory integrated with the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solution for critical services?
  2. How is ZT device management enabled for devices with and without remote access?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for UEDM solutions that align with Enterprise standards, ensuring compliance with Enterprise requirements.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by selecting and implementing UEM solutions to automate device inventory, management, and compliance, migrating from manual processes to an automated, policy-driven framework that continuously monitors health, configurations, and security status of devices for critical services.
  • The Component provides evidence that critical services, endpoints, and Non-Person Entities (NPEs) are enrolled and managed within the UEM solution under ZT principles, enabling device identification, granular access controls, and risk-based enforcement—regardless of physical location—and integrating with broader Enterprise security architectures and tools.
  • The Component ensures that the UEM solution supports continuous monitoring, automation, secure data sharing, and compliance checks for all managed devices, employing role-based and time-based access controls, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and encryption to safeguard sensitive resources and maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of device-related information.
  • The Component regularly audits and updates the Enterprise Data Management (EDM) and UEM processes, verifying and validating that inventory data is accurate, security policies remain aligned with Enterprise requirements, and the EDM solution effectively detects anomalies, enforces policy compliance, and mitigates risks to critical Component assets.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Enterprise sets standards and policies for EDM.
  2. Components manual inventory is integrated with an automated management solution for critical services.
  3. Components enable ZT device management (from any location with or without remote access).
  4. Where applicable, ensure tracking of NPEs in the UEM solution.

Activity 2.6.3 - Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 2

Activity 2.6.3 — Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 2
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components migrate the remaining devices to Enterprise Device Management (EDM) solution. EDM solution is integrated with risk and compliance solutions as appropriate.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
2.6.2 None
Expected Outcomes
  • Manual inventory of devices, software, and security posture of each device is integrated with an automated management solution for all services.
End State
All devices are managed and automation is utilized where applicable for rapid threat mitigation.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1 is defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as a predecessor to this activity.
  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis prior to this activity, to leverage device inventory.
  • Consider completing Activity 2.5.1 (Phase One) – Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools prior to this activity, to leverage asset vulnerability and patch management solutions.
  • Ensure Enterprise data privacy regulations are met, protecting sensitive information.
  • Verify and validate compatibility with the existing infrastructure, including legacy systems, environment Components, and other security solutions.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.6.3 — Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 2
Migrate the remaining devices to the Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solution and integrate the devices with risk and compliance solutions, as appropriate.
Review the Enterprise UEDM Integration and Device Migration Plan:
  • Leverage existing Enterprise standards and policies for managing the UEDM solution, from Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1.
  • Leverage approved Hardware/Software List for environment authentication, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
  • Verify and validate that the Component Master Device Inventory accurately reflects the current environment(s).
Verify and validate the migration plan:
  • Develop a strategy for migrating the manual device inventory to an automated process using the UEDM solution.
  • Leverage existing Enterprise strategies and guidance to migrate all remaining approved devices to the Enterprise UEDM solution.
  • Confirm the accuracy and completeness of the manual inventory data.
Verify and validate UEDM functionality:
  • Confirm the configuration of the UEDM solution.
  • Confirm import of manual inventory data.
  • Confirm UEDM output to the manual inventory list.
  • Confirm automated management of the devices running critical services.
  • Confirm interoperability with existing compliance tools that support risk assessment and compliance monitoring.
Enforce patch management and configuration baselines.
Establish patch management and configuration baseline plans:
  • Leverage Enterprise policies for patch management, including patch management (e.g., identify, test, deploy, verify and validate, etc.) and configuration baseline management (e.g., create, enforce, monitor, etc.).
  • Leverage the Component selected Asset Vulnerability and Patch Management solutions, from Activity 2.5.1 (Phase One) – Implement Asset, Vulnerability, and Patch Management Tools.
  • Review vulnerability management activities in the other pillars, if completed, to ensure consistent implementation across Component Devices, Applications, Assets, and Services (DAAS).
Confirm implementation of patch management and configuration baseline plans:
  • Verify and validate the implementation and configuration of patch management solutions to automate patch deployment, verification, and validation.
  • Verify and validate the creation, enforcement, and monitoring of configuration baselines.
Confirm interoperability with the existing compliance monitoring solution:
  • Verify and validate solution interoperability across multiple systems within the Component’s environment.
  • Verify and validate interoperability between compliance solutions to ensure a hardened security posture.
Integrate device information with UEDM.
UEDM device integration:
  • Leverage the Component UEDM solution, from Activity 2.6.2 (Phase One) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 1.
  • Integrate devices into the UEDM solution.
  • Verify and validate the output of UEDM for the accuracy of the manual inventory of devices, software, and security posture.
  • Verify and validate UEDM's interoperability, integration, and configuration with the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Configuration Management (CM) solutions to ensure continuous security and monitoring.
  • Verify and validate Enterprise policy compliance and identify any potential issues.
Implement device quarantine for non-compliant devices.
Enforce Enterprise cybersecurity guidance:
  • Verify and validate device compliance criteria, including security posture, software updates, and configuration baselines.
  • Verify and validate Enterprise policies that define the response for non-compliant devices, such as environment isolation, restricted access, and remediation steps.
Verify and validate the integration of compliance tools:
  • Verify and validate security tools that support device isolation, remote quarantine, continuous monitoring and alerting, and interoperability with existing tools.
Verify and validate the integration of the UEDM solution:
  • Verify and validate that the UEDM solution will be configured to monitor devices continuously and automatically quarantine non-compliant devices.
  • Verify and validate the integration of the UEDM solution with SIEM tools to ensure continuous monitoring and alerting.
Continuously test and monitor solutions and devices to maintain compliance.
Test, verify, and validate solution functionality:
  • Conduct functional testing to ensure that the quarantine capability works as expected. Testing should include at a minimum:
    • Isolating compromised devices.
    • Network restrictions during quarantine.
    • The process for releasing devices from quarantine.
    • Specific frequency of these tests (e.g., after every major update, quarterly, etc.).
  • Perform security testing to identify and mitigate any vulnerabilities. Such as penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, etc.
    • The Component should assign security testing to groups as appropriate. Examples include internal or external vulnerability management teams, Cybersecurity Service Providers (CSSPs), etc.
  • Resolve/remediate vulnerabilities in accordance with the Component vulnerability management plan.
Monitor and audit devices to maintain security compliance:
  • Monitor all implementation and integration to ensure security and performance.
    • Monitoring should be conducted to facilitate the effectiveness of the vulnerability management plan as well as operational impacts and performance metrics, such as resource usage (e.g., storage space, Central Processing Unit (CPU)/Random-Access Memory (RAM) usages, etc.).
  • Perform regular audits to verify and validate security policy compliance and identify potential issues.
  • Monitor all devices in real-time/near real-time to enable the Enterprise to detect and respond to potential security threats promptly, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and resources.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.6.3 (Phase Two) – Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 2 of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the integration of device migration into the Enterprise Device Management (EDM) solution and the integration of that solution with risk and compliance solutions. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including the integration of manual inventory with an automated management solution.

Activity 2.6.3 — Enterprise Device Management (EDM) Part 2 - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How are remaining devices migrated to the EDM solution?
  2. How is the EDM solution integrated with risk and compliance solutions?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for migrating remaining devices into an EDM solution, integrating with risk and compliance tools, patch management systems, and configuration baseline frameworks in alignment with Enterprise security requirements.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by selecting Unified Endpoint and Device Management (UEDM) solutions that provide comprehensive device coverage and implementing automated processes for asset discovery, enrollment, continuous monitoring, patch deployment, and baseline Configuration Management (CM), ensuring that all devices adhere to established Enterprise requirements.
  • The Component provides evidence that the UEDM solution is integrated with risk assessment and compliance monitoring platforms, Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions, and Network Access Control (NAC) mechanisms, enabling real-time security posture assessments, threat detection, and automated remediation (e.g., quarantining non-compliant devices, etc.) across all endpoints.
  • The Component ensures that manual inventories are replaced with a fully automated, policy-driven management approach, consolidating device, software, and security posture data into a single approved source, thereby simplifying reporting, improving operational efficiency, and enhancing the Component’s overall cybersecurity posture.
  • The Component continuously audits, tests, verifies, and validates the integrated solutions, employing User Acceptance Testing (UAT), functional and security assessments, and compliance reviews, and makes necessary adjustments to policies, tool configurations, and procedures to maintain ongoing compliance, effectiveness, and alignment with ZT principles.
Expected Outcomes
  1. Manual inventory of devices, software, and security posture of each device is integrated with an automated management solution for all services.

Capability 2.7 - Endpoint and Extended Detection and Response (EDR and XDR)

Capability 2.7 — Endpoint and Extended Detection and Response (EDR and XDR)
DoW CIO Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Pillar Capability
2 - Device 2.7 - Endpoint and Extended Detection and Response (EDR and XDR)
Description
DoW Components use Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tooling to monitor, detect, and remediate malicious activity on endpoints. Expanding the capability to include XDR tooling allows organizations to account for activity beyond the endpoints such as cloud and network as well.
Impact to ZT
Threats originating from network-connected endpoints are initially reduced through active investigation and response. Maturation focuses on forensics and faster threat detection and remediation are enabled by correlating data across multiple security layers (e.g., email, cloud, endpoint).

 2.7 Endpoint and Extended Detection and Response (EDR and XDR) - Scenario

The following scenario illustrates the practical applications and considerations for this capability:

  • The Component deploys Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions to monitor all endpoints on the network, detecting and mitigating malicious activity in real-time.
  • Security policies are configured in the EDR solution to automatically isolate compromised endpoints from the network, embodying the Zero Trust (ZT) principle of assuming breach and limiting the spread of potential threats.
  • The Component’s Security Operations Center (SOC) receives an alert from the EDR solution noting unusual activity on a workstation, including unauthorized attempts to escalate privileges.
  • SOC analysts investigate the alert, leveraging the EDR solution to retrieve detailed forensic data, confirming that malware was installed on the endpoint.
  • The compromised endpoint is quarantined remotely, and remediation steps such as removing malware and applying patches, are executed through the EDR solution.
  • To expand visibility beyond endpoints, the Component integrates Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions, correlating data from email, cloud, and network activity with endpoint telemetry.
  • XDR detects a coordinated attack where malicious actors attempt to exfiltrate data by exploiting both endpoint and cloud-based vulnerabilities.
  • The integrated XDR solution automatically triggers a containment response, blocking suspicious activity across multiple security layers and notifies the SOC.
  • Post-incident analysis reveals gaps in the Component’s detection policies, prompting updates to strengthen EDR and XDR rules and improve threat-hunting capabilities.
  • By leveraging EDR for endpoint security and expanding to XDR for multi-layered threat detection and response, the Component minimizes risks from network-connected endpoints and advanced threats.

Positive Impacts

The following is not a comprehensive list of benefits, but rather a selection of the advantages fundamental to this capability:

  • Enhanced Threat Detection
  • Accelerated Incident Response (IR)
  • Expanded Visibility
  • Improved Threat-Hunting Effectiveness
  • Strengthened Security Analytics

Technologies

The below is not a comprehensive list of technologies:

  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
  • Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
  • Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)/Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)
  • Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
  • Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Solutions

Activity 2.7.1 - Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C)

Activity 2.7.1 — Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C)
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components procure and implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution(s) within environments. EDR is protecting, monitoring, and responding to malicious and anomalous activities enabling ZT Target-level functionality and is sending data to the Comply-to-Connect (C2C) solution for expanded device and user checks.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
2.3.4 2.7.2
Expected Outcomes
  • EDR tooling is implemented
  • Critical EDR data is being sent to C2C for checks.
  • Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) tooling covers the maximum amount of services/applications.
End State
Detect advanced threats that are undetectable by a traditional antivirus program, optimizing the response time of incidents, discarding false positives, implement blocking, and protect against multiple threats happening simultaneously across various threat vectors.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Activity 2.3.4 (Discovery) – Integrate Next-Generation Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) is defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as a predecessor to this activity.
  • Consider completing Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis prior to this activity, to obtain an accurate device inventory list.
  • Endpoints are physical devices that connect to and exchange information with a computer network (e.g., mobile devices, desktop computers, virtual machines, embedded devices, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, servers, etc.).
  • Endpoint Detection Response (EDR) is a fundamental element of an Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP).
  • EDR gives security teams the visibility and automation needed to improve Incident Response (IR) and prevent attacks on endpoints from spreading.
  • Evaluate agent-based, agentless, or hybrid EDR deployment models based on system requirements.
  • Assess whether a single EDR solution or multiple EDR solutions are required to meet the Component's needs.
  • Verify and validate that the EDR solution(s) can provide logs with enough data for the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)/Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) to utilize, where applicable.
  • Verify and validate that the EDR solution(s) can integrate with the Privileged Access Management (PAM), Identity Provider (IdP), SIEM, and SOAR.
  • Assess EDR performance limits, considering the potential volume of signatures and behavioral patterns within the environment.
  • Identify EDR exceptions to allow for functionality that balances exceptions between security and usability while meeting the overall cybersecurity goals.
  • Activity 2.7.2 (Phase Two) – Implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) Part 1 is defined by the DoW ZT Framework as a successor to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.7.1 — Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C)
Identify endpoints for implementing an EDR solution.
Review existing device inventory:
  • Leverage approved asset inventory, from Activity 2.1.1 (Discovery) – Device Health Tool Gap Analysis.
  • Verify and validate against the Configuration Management Database (CMDB) and asset management systems for accuracy.
  • Update the Configuration Item Baseline (CIB) as required.
  • Identify unsupported legacy systems that may require compensating controls.
  • Identify how EDR will integrate with existing Component-defined IR policies and procedures. Identify which EDR metrics will be used to identify incidents.
Implement EDR across all identified endpoints.
Leverage existing EPP integration:
  • Leverage the Component-selected EPP solution, from Activity 2.3.4 (Discovery) – Integrate NextGeneration Antivirus (NextGen AV) Tools with Comply-to-Connect (C2C).
  • Confirm the EDR is a fundamental component of the EPP solution, which, when integrated together, enables a robust, comprehensive endpoint security strategy.
  • Verify and validate that the selected EDR solution integrates seamlessly with the existing EPP framework.
  • Ensure endpoint configurations adhere to Enterprise security baselines.
  • Document all verification and validation processes, including rollback and recovery procedures.
  • Monitor the EDR solutions for incidents and IRs in accordance with the Component IR policies.
Verify and validate EDR solution(s), monitor, protect, and respond to malicious and anomalous activities (e.g., antivirus, antimalware, blocking, protection measures, etc.).
Verify and validate EDR monitoring capabilities:
  • Confirm real-time monitoring of endpoints for malware, ransomware, unapproved access, and behavioral anomalies.
  • Test EDR response capabilities, including automatic quarantine, process termination, and alert generation.
  • Verify and validate the integration of antivirus and anti-malware capabilities within the EDR solution.
  • Conduct simulation exercises (e.g., malware injection tests, etc.) to confirm effective detection and response functionality.
  • Review logs and alerts to verify and validate accuracy and completeness.
Configure EDR to transmit critical data to the C2C solution(s) for enhanced device and User/Person Entity (PE) checks.
Confirm EDR to C2C configuration:
  • Ensure critical telemetry data points (e.g., process creation, file access, etc.) for transmission have been identified.
  • Verify and validate secure communication channels (e.g., encrypted Application Programming Interface (API) calls, etc.) between EDR and C2C platforms have been established.
  • Confirm EDR is configured to forward relevant logs and alerts to the C2C solution in real-time.
  • Verify and validate that EDR data fields have been mapped to corresponding C2C analytics requirements for consistency.
  • Ensure the implementation of data normalization and enrichment processes for C2C correlation has transpired.
  • Test, verify, and validate data transmission integrity and consistency across all integrated endpoints.
Verify and validate that C2C is receiving critical data from the EDR.
Confirm C2C receipt of critical data from the EDR:
  • Conduct end-to-end verification and validation to ensure C2C systems ingest EDR telemetry without data loss and with original data integrity.
  • Verify and validate that C2C accurately reflects endpoint health and security posture.
  • Perform correlation tests to ensure EDR data enhances the C2C ability to detect complex threats.
  • Simulate endpoint security incidents and verify and validate the C2C triggers appropriate security workflow and response.
  • Monitor data transmission latency and resolve performance bottlenecks.
  • Establish continuous monitoring and alerting on data ingestion failures.
Verify and validate that the EPP solution covers the broadest range of services and applications, where possible.
Assess and validate the EPP solution:
  • Assess EPP coverage across all Enterprise applications and services.
  • Verify and validate compatibility with various operating systems, virtual environments, and mobile platforms.
  • Test EPP effectiveness against diverse threat vector exploits (e.g., phishing, web-based attacks, zero-day threats, advanced persistent threats, etc.).
  • Verify and validate that EPP integrates seamlessly with EDR and C2C platforms.
  • Review vendor updates and threat intelligence feeds regularly to ensure comprehensive protection.
  • Conduct periodic assessments and penetration tests to validate EPP resilience.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.7.1 (Phase One) – Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tools and Integrate with C2C of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the incorporation of an Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution to monitor, detect, and remediate malicious activity within endpoints. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including EDR tooling, where critical data is sent to Comply-to-Connect (C2C) for verification and validation.

Activity 2.7.1 — Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How is the EDR solution implemented to monitor, detect, and remediate malicious activity on endpoints?
  2. How is critical EDR data sent to C2C for checks?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for identifying all relevant endpoints (e.g., workstations, mobile devices, servers, Internet of Things (IoT), cloud, and edge environments, etc.) that require EDR coverage, ensuring alignment with Enterprise security guidelines and ZT principles.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by deploying EDR solutions across maximum amount of identified endpoints, performing pilot tests, tuning configurations, and continuously monitoring for malicious and anomalous activities, ensuring that EDR capabilities (e.g., antivirus, anti-malware, threat hunting, etc.) meet established performance and security requirements.
  • The Component provides evidence that the EDR solution integrates with C2C solutions, transmitting critical endpoint data in real-time via secure Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), enabling enhanced device posture checks, automated alerts, and improved Incident Response (IR) capabilities.
  • The Component verifies and validates that the C2C platform receives, logs, and appropriately responds to critical EDR alerts and events, tests data flows, performs regular audits, and ensures that compliance and enforcement rules are effectively automated and maintained.
  • The Component confirms that Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) tools provide comprehensive security coverage (e.g., antivirus, data encryption, data loss prevention, etc.) for all services, applications, and endpoints, supporting ZT strategies by protecting assets outside the traditional network perimeter and maintaining continuous visibility of the security posture.
Expected Outcomes
  1. EDR tooling is implemented.
  2. Critical EDR data is being sent to C2C for checks.
  3. EPP tooling covers the maximum amount of services/applications.

Activity 2.7.2 - Implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) Part 1

Activity 2.7.2 — Implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) Part 1
DoW Zero Trust Framework
Content in this table is sourced from authoritative DoW Zero Trust Framework documentation current at the time of publication.
Description
DoW Components procure and implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solution(s). Integration points with cross-pillar capabilities (network, cloud services, applications) are identified and prioritized based on risk. XDR is aligned with C2C program. XDR capabilities either supplement or replace EDR implementations. Analysis and correlation capabilities are sent from the XDR solution stack to the SIEM.
Predecessor(s) Successor(s)
2.7.1, 7.2.1 2.7.3
Expected Outcomes
  • XDR solution is implemented and replaces EDR where possible.
  • Integration points have been identified and prioritized per capability.
  • XDR and SIEM have integrations to gain a comprehensive view of data integration, correlation, analytics, incident response, and automation.
End State
Expanding from an EDR to an XDR solution provides a holistic view of the threat landscape, allowing for coordinated response, automation, and orchestration when responding to threats.

Considerations

Below is a list of key prerequisites, potential challenges, and lessons learned that may influence the successful implementation of this activity. While informative, this list is not exhaustive, and its relevance may vary based on the specific environment and architecture.

  • Activity 2.7.1 (Phase One) – Implement Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) and Activity 7.2.1 (Phase One) – Threat Alerting Part 1 are defined by the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework as predecessors to this activity.
  • Expanding an Enterprise Endpoint Detection Response (EDR) to an Enterprise Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solution provides a holistic view of the threat landscape that allows for more effective Incident Response(s) (IR(s)).
  • Activity 2.7.3 (Phase Three) – Implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) Part 2 is defined by the DoW ZT Framework as a successor to this activity.

Implementation

The information below provides practical, actionable recommendations to support achieving the expected outcomes of this activity. These recommendations are not prescriptive or mandatory and should be adapted based the specific unique environment and system architecture.

For a visual overview of the tasks associated with this activity, please refer to the implementation task diagrams.

Implementation Tasks for Activity 2.7.2 — Implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) Part 1
Identify XDR requirements.
Assess the environment in preparation for a transition from an EDR to an XDR solution:
  • Select an XDR solution aligned with Component requirements to ensure compatibility with existing solutions.
  • Identify EDR deployments that can be replaced or extended by the XDR solution based on enhanced capabilities (e.g., cross-pillar correlation, advanced analytics, etc.).
  • Develop a phased approach to deployment, prioritizing assets that present the most risk to the Component/Enterprise.
  • Develop a phased approach to decommission any redundant EDR solutions, ensuring no coverage gaps occur during the transition.
Implement an XDR solution and replace EDR, where applicable.
  • Deploy XDR solutions across endpoints, environment devices, cloud services, and applications, where applicable.
Configure XDR policies within the environment:
  • Unify threat detection across multiple domains to simplify security management and improve visibility of devices across environments.
  • Automate response and remediation workflows to accelerate IR and reduce manual effort.
  • Conduct testing in isolated environments to ensure minimal disruption during production deployment.
  • Verify and validate that the XDR solution effectively replaces and/or supplements the existing EDR and is functionally compatible with the C2C and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions.
  • Update operational documentation to reflect new XDR processes and configurations.
Identify integration points between cross-pillar capabilities and the XDR and conduct a risk assessment of the identified integration points, where applicable.
Conduct a cross-pillar assessment to identify integration points between the XDR and existing solutions:
  • Review previously implemented activities to ensure successful integration and interoperability of the XDR and the existing EDR, C2C, and SIEM solutions.
Perform a risk assessment for each integration point and use the results to prioritize the integration points accordingly:
  • During the risk assessment, consider the data sensitivity, threat likelihood, potential impacts, and exposure to external networks for each integration point.
  • Prioritize integration points based on criticality to Enterprise cybersecurity posture.
  • Based on risk assessment findings, ensure XDR integration prioritizes the high-risk areas of the threat landscape within the environment (e.g., privileged access, external-facing applications, etc.).
  • Document dependencies, constraints, and challenges to inform further integration across the environment.
Ensure integration of XDR and SIEM solutions, which enable comprehensive data sharing and effective IR, where applicable.
Integrate the XDR and the SIEM solutions:
  • Identify critical data points from the XDR stack (e.g., alerts, behavioral anomalies, threat indicators, etc.) and configure the XDR to continuously normalize and forward the data to the SIEM for advanced correlation.
  • Establish data normalization and parsing rules within the SIEM to ensure data integrity.
Conduct integration checks to ensure data integrity and sharing enables effective IR:
  • Verify and validate data integrity before, during, and after data sharing between the XDR and SIEM solutions.
  • Verify and validate that SIEM dashboards and reports reflect XDR-generated analytics accurately.
  • Adjust SIEM correlation rules to incorporate XDR-specific telemetry for enhanced threat detection and response.
Integrate, test, verify, and validate the XDR with C2C, where applicable.
Integrate XDR with C2C:
  • Identify critical telemetry and compliance data from the XDR that should be shared with the C2C solution (e.g., endpoint compliance status, User/Person Entity (PE)/Non-Person Entity (NPE) behavior anomalies, etc.).
  • Establish secure integration between the XDR and C2C platforms using appropriate authentication and encryption mechanisms.
  • Configure automated workflows within C2C to leverage XDR insights for dynamic access decisions.
Verify and validate the XDR and C2C integration:
  • Verify and validate that C2C uses XDR data effectively for device authentication and approval decisions, and IR.
  • Ensure continuous monitoring and logging of XDR and C2C integration points.

Summary

This information below outlines the Activity 2.7.2 (Phase Two) – Implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) Part 1 of the Department of War (DoW) Zero Trust (ZT) Framework, focusing on the implementation of an Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solution to extend monitoring functionality. It presents strategic insights that drive implementation and expected outcomes, including the integration of XDR and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions to replace Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions where possible and appropriate.

Activity 2.7.2 — Implement Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Tools and Integrate with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) Part 1 - Workflow

Zero Trust Readiness Assessment Questions
  1. How are XDR tools procured and implemented to extend monitoring functionality?
  2. How are integration points with cross-pillar capabilities identified and prioritized?
Strategic Insights
  • The Component defines and documents policies and procedures for identifying cross-pillar integration points (e.g., endpoint security, network security, Identity Management (IdM), threat intelligence, etc.) and prioritizing them based on risk, ensuring alignment with Enterprise requirements.
  • The Component demonstrates compliance by deploying and configuring XDR solutions to replace or extend existing EDR capabilities, integrating with Comply-to-Connect (C2C) systems, Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR), and other security solutions, and enforcing policy-driven automated responses to threats.
  • The Component provides evidence that it has incorporated a strategy for continuous monitoring, data sharing, and enforcement across all pillars, integrating Endpoint Protection Platforms (EPPs), EDR, and XDR to maximize coverage of services, applications, endpoints, and cloud environments, thereby enhancing threat detection, Incident Response (IR), and compliance enforcement.
  • The Component verifies and validates that critical data from XDR is transmitted to the SIEM solution, ensuring that basic analytics, events, and alerts are accurately correlated and enriched and that suspicious activities are detected, escalated, and addressed in real-time through integrated SOAR solutions.
  • The Component continuously tests, verifies, validates, and audits these integrations (e.g., XDR with C2C, EDR with XDR, XDR with SIEM, etc.), performing functional, security, and User Acceptance Testing (UAT) to confirm that all components align with ZT principles, maintain compliance, and effectively mitigate evolving threats.
Expected Outcomes
  1. XDR solution is implemented and replaces EDR where possible.
  2. Integration points have been identified and prioritized per capability.
  3. XDR and SIEM have integrations to gain a comprehensive view of data integration, correlation, analytics, IR, and automation.