|
Research
Skip Research Menus
Research MenuSecurity Enhanced Linux What's New Frequently Asked Questions Background Documents License Download Participating Mail List Archives Remaining Work Contributors Related Work Press Releases Information Assurance Research NIARL In-house Research Areas Mathematical Sciences Program Sabbaticals Computer & Information Sciences Research Technology Transfer Advanced Computing Advanced Mathematics Communications & Networking Information Processing Microelectronics Other Technologies Technology Fact Sheets Publications Related Links |
SELinux Mailing ListRE: hello?
From: Zachary Uram <zu22_at_andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:23:26 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Jonathan, Oh I see.
> OpenBSD is an exercise in phenominal auditing. I think they've found one, maybe two, potential security problems in the pasy year. It is also a hotbed of encryption. Their IPSec implementation is extremely good, for example, and OpenSSH is one of the best SSH clones going. Auditing is software verification & validation testing? How do they find the bugs in the code?
> As for which is better, it depends on which track suits your needs the best. Personally, I suspect that when the Stanford Checker is released onto the world, the wholesale auditing of Linux, the various extensions, and every package ever written for it, will become an industry of its own. What is Stanford Checker? Can I download it for free? What is website? Is it like the weblint of Linux security?
> The other thing you need to consider is that SELinux, as it stands, isn't designed to work with MOSIX, yet MOSIX seems (from the publicity) to be destined for the kernel. This means that SELinux is going to need some degree of extending and bashing to get it to work with a distributed environment. MOSIX is to Linux as POSIX is to UNIX? Does MOSIX have website?
> I've never tried SELinux with Debian, but it should run just fine. It's not distribution-specific.
Cool.
I want to start installing different secure OSes on my machines and then try break in and examine my logs to learn.
SDG,
uram@cmu.edu
-- You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.Received on Fri 8 Jun 2001 - 15:25:58 EDT |
|
|
Date Posted: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Modified: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Reviewed: Jan 15, 2009 |












