Re: New security policy

From: Shaun Savage <savages_at_pcez.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:17:08 -0800


Stephen Smalley wrote:

>On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Shaun Savage wrote:
>
>>I have compiled some of the selinux utils for RH7.2, I hope to do the
>>rest this week.
>>this is how I did it
>>
>>I first did >rpm -bp XXXX.spec
>>the patched the XXXX directory using the patch
>>on some XXXX i needed to autoconf (caution: the autoconf that comes
>>with RH7.2 is bad upgrade to 2.52 from GNU.org)
>>I then go back to the SPEC directory and rpm -bc --short-circuit XXXX.spec
>>then rpm -bi --short-circuit XXXX.spec
>>
>
>In our work in upgrading the utilities, we've encountered a fair number of
>rejects from the existing patches that have required manual merging, and
>at least some of those manual merges were non-trivial. We also had to add
>stat64 variants of the stat_secure system calls, with transparent
>redirection, in order to support the new fileutils package. Are you
>actually dealing with any of these kinds of issues in your patches?
>

I entered most of patches by hand, I thought most the manual patches easy. The issue of stat_secure calls with transparent redirection, I don't know. I have only working on selinux for about 3 days. I want to get the support programs ported first. If you want I can make RPM's.

Shaun Savage

--
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
Received on Mon 10 Dec 2001 - 12:39:21 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 on Wed 11 Jun 2008 - 08:10:26 EDT