Re: New security policy

From: Stephen Smalley <sds_at_tislabs.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:02:15 -0500 (EST)

On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Shaun Savage wrote:

> I have compiled some of the selinux utils for RH7.2, I hope to do the
> rest this week.
> this is how I did it
>
> I first did >rpm -bp XXXX.spec
> the patched the XXXX directory using the patch
> on some XXXX i needed to autoconf (caution: the autoconf that comes
> with RH7.2 is bad upgrade to 2.52 from GNU.org)
> I then go back to the SPEC directory and rpm -bc --short-circuit XXXX.spec
> then rpm -bi --short-circuit XXXX.spec

In our work in upgrading the utilities, we've encountered a fair number of rejects from the existing patches that have required manual merging, and at least some of those manual merges were non-trivial. We also had to add stat64 variants of the stat_secure system calls, with transparent redirection, in order to support the new fileutils package. Are you actually dealing with any of these kinds of issues in your patches?

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com





--
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
Received on Mon 10 Dec 2001 - 11:15:02 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 on Wed 11 Jun 2008 - 08:10:26 EDT