On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:13:14PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Yes. Sun is the only vendor I've come across that ships packages that mess
> with /usr/local. They seem to think that a Sun package of bash for Solaris
> 2.6 (distributed from a Sun web site) should install to /usr/local/bin while
> a package for Solaris 8.0 (distributed on the install CDs) should be in /bin.
> This sort of thing really sucks when you are trying to manage a network.
OpenBSD also does this. bash is in /usr/local/bin even though it's not a port or a 3rd party piece, but an official package.
I agree on that not being good practice. I don't know that rationale for these, though.
-- http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html pub 1024D/D88D35A6 2001-11-14 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org> Key fingerprint = 276B B7BB E4D8 FCCE DB8F F965 310B 811A D88D 35A6 -- You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.Received on Fri 30 Nov 2001 - 17:24:17 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 on Wed 11 Jun 2008 - 08:10:26 EDT