On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Jonathan Day wrote:

>IMHO, there's a right time for everything, and right now, that seems to
>be to examine the new infrastructure that's going to be used. Will it
>mean that the next version of SELinux will be more restricted? More
>flexible? How secure is the infrastructure itself? The new version of
>SELinux will be using external code - has it been audited? What else can
>it do?

On this topic (the new infrastructure, using external code), let me note that the SELinux project has been contributing to the development of the LSM kernel patch as well as developing our own SELinux module that uses the hooks provided by that patch. So we aren't simply using an external patch developed by others - we have been involved in the development and review of the patch from a very early stage.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com





--
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.