Am Montag, 30. September 2002 10:21 schrieb Russell Coker:
> I've added such a change to my tree to make it use $1_lpr_spool_t.
> Although it has occurred to me that perhaps the best thing to do is to
> remove cupsd_spool_t and replace it with lpd_spool_t instead. What do
> you think?

I am not sure. I my opinion is a serparate type per domain the better solution. It is more clear in contrast to domains which use other domains types special _tmp_t and spool_t types.
But we could use an generic type like print_spool_t instead of lpd_spool_t and cupsd_spool_t.

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.