On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Russell Coker wrote:

> I've added such a change to my tree to make it use $1_lpr_spool_t. Although
> it has occurred to me that perhaps the best thing to do is to remove
> cupsd_spool_t and replace it with lpd_spool_t instead. What do you think?

Do you mean $1_lpd_spool_t? There is no $1_lpr_spool_t in my policy.

--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com




--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.