|
Security Enhanced Linux
What's New
Frequently Asked Questions
Background
Documents
License
Download
Participating
Mail List
Archives
Remaining Work
Contributors
Related Work
Press Releases
Information Assurance Research
NIARL In-house Research Areas
Mathematical Sciences Program
Sabbaticals
Computer & Information Sciences Research
Technology Transfer
Advanced Computing
Advanced Mathematics
Communications & Networking
Information Processing
Microelectronics
Other Technologies
Technology Fact Sheets
Publications
Related Links
|
SELinux Mailing ListRe: have you seen spfx2.c?
From: Grant Bayley <gbayley_at_ausmac.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:14:35 +1100 (EST)
What I don't understand with Linux users is the endless desire to prevent broken things by patching around them in the kernel. Why not concentrate on cleaning up the userland apps in Linux in such a way that they're not overflowable in the first place? No broken [suid | sgid | priviliged uid daemon ] userland apps means you have a substantially better chance of keeping a system secure without all the sleight of hand that lkms typically pull to prevent something bad from happening. Think about this logic for a second, then check out: Grant On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 0x@bk.ru wrote: > > have you seen the security module > http://packetstorm.decepticons.org/linux/security/spfx2.c ? -- You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.Received on Sat 1 Dec 2001 - 22:24:35 EST |
|
|
Date Posted: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Modified: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Reviewed: Jan 15, 2009 |











